Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2625 Jhar
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 37 of 2025
1. Narayan Saw, age 49 years, S/o Late Doman Saw,
2. Rajesh Kumar, age 26 years, S/o Narayan Saw,
3. Babuni Saw, age 42 years, S/o Late Doman Saw,
All appellants are R/o Village Singhrawa, P.O. and P.S. Chauparan,
District Hazaribag, Jharkhand --- --- Appellants
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and Another --- --- Respondents
---
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
---
For the Appellants: Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate For the Resp.-State: Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P.
---
02 / 13.02.2025 Admit.
Call for the photocopy of the lower court records.
This interlocutory application has been filed for grant of bail during the pendency of this appeal.
2. The appellants have faced trial in S.T. No. 309 of 2015 arising out of Chauparan P.S. Case No. 24 of 2014 corresponding to G.R. No. 623 of 2014 in the court of Shri Braj Kishore Pandey-II, Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Hazaribag, whereby and wherein, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Hazaribag vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.12.2024 and 16.12.2024 respectively, held the appellants guilty of the offences under sections 341, 323, 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo R.I for seven years along with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- for the offences under section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In default of payment of fine, they were directed to undergo R.I for six months. They were further sentenced to undergo R.I two years along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence under section 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In default of payment of fine, they were further directed to undergo R.I for three months. They were further sentenced to undergo R.I for one year along with a fine of Rs. 1,000/ for the offence under section 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In default of payment of fine, they were further directed to undergo R.I for one month. They were further sentenced to undergo S.I for one month along with a fine of Rs. 500/- for the offence
under sections 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In default of payment of fine, they were further directed to undergo S.I for seven days. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
3. It was submitted that the present case is counter blast to the case filed by the appellant parties against the Informant of this case under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It was further submitted that sessions trial of the case relating to murder of the father of the appellant nos. 1 and 3 is still pending in the Sessions Court. It was further submitted that the appellants are in custody for six months and there is no likelihood of this criminal appeal to be taken up for hearing in the near future.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts, during the pendency of this appeal, appellants, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Hazaribag in connection with S.T. No. 309 of 2015 arising out of Chauparan P.S. Case No. 24 of 2014 corresponding to G.R. No. 623 of 2014.
5. The aforesaid I.A. stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!