Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pankaj Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 7323 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7323 Jhar
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Pankaj Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 8 December, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                 Cr. Revision No. 979 of 2025

 Pankaj Kumar                                    ......   ... Petitioner
                               Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
2.Uday Kumar Singh
                                               ..... ...        Opposite Parties
                   --------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Santosh Kr. Soni, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, A.P.P For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate

04/ 08.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.

2. I.A. No.12510 of 2025 has been filed for condoning the delay of 267 days in filing the revision application.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in preparation and collecting the documents such delay has occurred in view of that the delay of 267 days may kindly be condoned.

4. Learned counsel for the State and O.P. No.2 oppose the prayer.

5. Considering that the matter is arising out of Negotiable Instrument Act and for the reasons assigned in the I.A, the Court finds that sufficient ground has been made for condoning the delay. As such, delay of 267 days in filing the revision application is condoned.

6. I.A. No.12510 of 2025 stands allowed and disposed of

7. I.A. No.12499 of 2025 has been filed for suspension of sentence and release the petitioner on bail during the pendency of the instant criminal revision.

8. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Koderma by judgement dated 12.09.2023 held the petitioner guilty under section 138 of N.I. Act arising out of Complaint Case No. 1271 of 2021, T.R. No. 290/2023 and further sentenced the petitioner to undergo S.I. for six months and to pay Rs. 8,40,000/- by way of compensation to the complainant within 45 days. He further submits that said judgment was challenged before the learned Sessions Judge, Koderma, in Criminal Appeal No. 65 of 2023 and by judgment dated 11.09.2024 the learned appellate court has been pleased to dismiss the appeal and affirmed the judgment of learned trial court.

9. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in judicial custody since 20.08.2025 and awarded sentence is six months. He further submits that before the appellate Court the petitioner has already deposited Rs. 2,00,000/- and petitioner is ready to negotiate with the complainant on the point of compromise if he is released from the custody.

5. Learned counsel for the State submits that the matter is arising out of Negotiable Instrument Act.

10. Learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 submits that he has no instruction that deposited amount before the learned appellate court has been received by the complainant or not. He further submits that petitioner may kindly be directed to pay certain amount to the complainant.

11. In view of above and considering that matter is arising out 138 of N.I. Act, the petitioner is in custody since 20.08.2025 and the petitioner has already deposited Rs. 2,00,000/- before the learned appellate court and in view of that the petitioner is directed to deposit a bank draft of Rs. 1,00,000/- drawn in the name of complainant before the learned Registrar General of this Court by 22.12.2025.

12. In view of above, during pendency of this criminal revision petition, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Koderma in connection with Complaint Case No. 1271 of 2021, T.R. No. 290/2023, subject to compliance of aforesaid condition and also subject to the condition that one of the bailor must be own relative.

13. I.A. No.12499 of 2025 is allowed and disposed of.

14. If the aforesaid direction is not complied by the petitioner within stipulated period, complainant is put at liberty to file appropriate petition before this Court.

( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dt. 08.12.2025 satyarthi-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter