Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5340 Jhar
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Civil Revision No.35 of 2023
Gopal Pradhan .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Others .... Opposite Parties
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shresth Gautam, Adv.
For the Opp. Party Nos.1-2 : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari,(A.C. to S.C-I).
Mr. Ankit Kumar, A.C. to S.C-I
Order No.08/Dated- 30th April, 2025
1. Perused the office note dated 26.04.2025. It appears that O.P.
Nos. 06 to 10 have appeared though Vakalatnama, however, on
call no one appeared.
2. Notices upon O.P. Nos.3, 11 and 13 have been received by their
sons. Notices of O.P. Nos.04 and 12 have been received by their
brother and nephew, respectively. Hence, notices upon O.P.
Nos. 3, 4, 5, 11, 12 and 13 are deemed to be validly served.
3. O.P. No.5 has received the notice himself. Hence, notices upon
all the opposite parties have been served.
4. The factual aspects of the case is that the original Title Suit
No.88 of 2004 filed by the plaintiff/petitioner was decreed
ex parte in the year 2012 in which original defendant nos. 1, 3
and 5 appeared, but they did not filed regular written statement
for a considerable period and the original defendant nos. 2 and
4 did not appear in spite of service of notice. Therefore, the
court proceeded ex parte against all the original defendants and
Page | 1
passed the judgment dated 30.07.2012 and accordingly, decree
was drawn.
5. Against ex parte decree, an application under Order IX rule 13
CPC read with 151 C.P.C. was filed for setting aside the ex parte
decree by State along with Executive Engineer, M/s
Subernarekha Canal Division vide Civil Misc. Case No. 02 of
2015 which was also dismissed by the Civil Judge,
Senior-Division No.1st Jamshedpur vide order dated 22.09.2022.
Against the said order, an appeal was preferred by the State-
respondents of this case vide civil misc. No. 14 of 2022
(Annexure-6) which was allowed vide impugned order dated
12th October, 2023 and the same has been assailed by the present
petitioner.
This revision is filed within limitation period, hence this
case is admitted.
6. Office is directed to call for zerox copy of trial court record from
the court concerned.
7. Let the matter be listed on 11.06.2025.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Amar/-
Page | 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!