Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sukhlal Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 4566 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4566 Jhar
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Sukhlal Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand on 4 April, 2025

Author: Ambuj Nath
Bench: Ambuj Nath
                                                               2025: JHHC:10700

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                       W.P. (Cr.) No. 88 of 2023
                              ------

Sukhlal Singh, son of Darbari Singh, aged about 48 years, resident of village-Chutki Ghutua, P.O. & P.S.-Latehar, District-

      Latehar, Jharkhand                             ... ... Petitioner
                                       -Versus -
       1. The State of Jharkhand

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Jail & Disaster Management, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand

3. The Inspector General of Prisons, Got. of Jharkhand, T.A. Division, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand

4. The Superintendent of Police, Central Jail, Palamau, P.O. and P.S. Medininagar, District-Palamau, Jharkhand

5. The Probation Officer, Department of Home, Jail & Disaster Management, Govt. of Jharkhand, P.O. and P.S.-Latehar Dist.-Latehar, Jharkhand ... ... Opposite Parties

------

CORAM: - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH

------

        For the Petitioner       : M/s. Rinku Bhakat, Advocate
        For the State            : M/s. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.
                                         -----
14/04.04.2025

The petitioner has filed this application for quashing of the part of the decision of the State Sentence Review Board, dated 20.10.2022 vide Memo No. 11/Prison No. 05/2021-4263 issued under the Signature of the Under Secretary, Department of Home, Jail & Disaster Management, Govt. of Jharkhand, whereby and wherein, the claim of premature release of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "the judgment of conviction and order of sentence against the convict Sukhlal Singh for the offence under Section 396 and 397 of the I.P.C. is confirmed by the Hon'ble Court and it will not be proper to release him from judicial custody.

2. Perused the report of the State Sentence Review Board, dated 20.10.2022, from perusal of which, it appears that the Superintendent of Police, Latehar has submitted the report that the petitioner was not a habitual criminal. He has also stated that no case was pending against him in Latehar District and the local villagers, on enquiry, submitted that if the petitioner is released, the villagers will not have any problem. It further appears that the

report of Probation Officer was also perused. The Probation Officer has reported that the parents of the petitioner are very old and considering the age of the petitioner, it does not appear that he will indulge in any crime. The consideration for release of the petitioner on remission has only been rejected on the ground that the convicting Court has stated that since the petitioner was convicted under Sections 396 and 397 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act and his appeal has also been dismissed by the Hon'ble Court, he should not be released on remission.

3. The petitioner Sukhlal Singh was tried in connection with S.T. Case No. 135 of 2004 arising out of Barkakana Rail P.S. Case No. 19 of 2004 and was convicted and sentenced under Section 396, 397 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act.

4. It was submitted that after remaining in custody for more than 24 years, this case was pressed before the State Sentence Review Board for his release, but by the order dated 20.10.2022, as stated above, his release on remission has been rejected.

5. Reliance has been placed upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in case of Jaswant Singh and Others versus State of Chhattisgarh and Another as reported in [2023 SCC Online SC 35] in which Hon'ble Supreme Court has held at Paragraph 22.

"22. In the present case, there is nothing to indicate that the presiding judge took into account the factors which have been laid down in Laxman Naskar v. Union of India (supra). These factors include assessing (i) whether the offence affects the society at large; (ii) the probability of the crime being repeated; (iii) the potential of the convict to commit crimes in future; (iv) if any fruitful purpose is being served by keeping the convict in prison; and (v) the socio-

economic condition of the convict's family. In Laxman Naskar v. State of West Bengal (supra) and State of Haryana v. Jagdish, (2010) 4 SCC 216, this Court has reiterated that these factors will be considered while deciding the application of a convict for premature release."

6. In the present case, the Superintendent of Police and the Probation Officer have reported that if the petitioner is released on remission, there is no likelihood of his committing any offence in future. It further appears that no fruitful purpose will be served by keeping the convict Sukhla Singh in custody. It also appears that the socio-economic condition of the convict is not good and he has to look after his ailing parents. The learned Convicting

Court has not stated anything apart from the fact that the petitioner has been sentenced in a case of serious nature as to why his release on remission should not be considered. It appears that the prayer for release of the petitioner on remission has not been reasonably considered by the State Sentence Review Board.

7. In view of the aforesaid facts, the matter is remanded back to the State Sentence Review Board for considering the prayer of the petitioner for releasing him on remission afresh. The State Sentence Review Board shall seek further opinion from the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar, whether the petitioner shall be released on remission or not. The learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar shall give afresh opinion accompanied by adequate reasons after taking into consideration the grounds as laid down in Laxman Naskar versus Union of India [(2010) 4 SCC 216]. The State Sentence Review Board shall also forward a copy of the report of the Superintendent of Police, Latehar and the report of Probation Officer to the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar so that he can give a fresh opinion based on the materials available on the record. The matter should be disposed of within three months from the date of receipt of this order.

8. This application is allowed.

(Ambuj Nath, J.) Nandini/-

Uploaded

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter