Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gautam Gope @ Jawala Aged About 29 Years ... vs The State Of Jharkhand
2024 Latest Caselaw 9602 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9602 Jhar
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Gautam Gope @ Jawala Aged About 29 Years ... vs The State Of Jharkhand on 24 September, 2024

Author: Ratnaker Bhengra

Bench: Ratnaker Bhengra

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                            Cr.A(SJ) No. 359 of 2024

Gautam Gope @ Jawala aged about 29 years son of Ashok Gope @ Chamar
Gope, resident of village - Bakaspur Saketoli, PO- Lapa & P.S.- Karra,
District- Khunti ( Jharkhand).                       .. .. ..Appellant
                               --VERSUS--

The State Of Jharkhand                                      ... ..Respondent

                             ---------
CORAM:         HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
                             ---------

    For the Appellant :        Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Adv
    For the Respondent :       Mr. Sardhu Mahto, APP


03/DATED: 24-09-2024

              I,A, No. 9281 of 2024

             Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

That instant interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the appellant above named to release him on bail by suspending the sentences awarded to him by the court below during the pendency of present Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 359 of 2024 which has been preferred for setting aside of the judgment of conviction dated 22/05/2024 and sentence dated 27/05/2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Khunti, in Sessions Trial Case No. 110/2023, arising out of Jariyagarh P.S. Case No.06/2023 (GR Case No. 202/2023), whereby and where under the aforesaid learned Court below has convicted the appellant above, named, for committing offence under Sections 25(1-B)a, 25(6), 26/35 of Arms Act and then sentenced him to undergo R.I for 3 years under Section 25(1- B)a, 35 of Arms Act with a fine of Rs. 10, 000/- and in default of payment of fine S.I. for 3 months and further R.I. for 2 years under Section 26/35 of Arms Act with a fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine S.I. for 1 month, however, both the sentences have been directed to run concurrently and the custody undergone during the trial will be set off.

The learned counsel for the appellant referred to para- 4 of this interlocutory application and pointed out that the appellant has been in custody for about eight months out of maximum imposed sentence of three years which may be considered while the bail prayer of the appellant. It is further submitted that one of the con-convict, namely, Lakhan Gope who was

allegedly assaulted along with the appellant has been granted bail in Cr.Appeal (SJ) No. 318 of 2024 vide order dated 23.08.2024 by this Court. Counsel says that his case is similar to co-convict, namely, Lakhan Gope and, therefore, his prayer for suspension of sentence may also be considered. It is further submitted that the case against the appellant has only been sustained only on his confession which has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law, moreover, counsel says that the prayer for bail may be considered in the aforesaid circumstances and moreover the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future which may also be considered.

The learned counsel for the State, learned APP has opposed the prayer for suspension of sentence and submitted that prosecution witnesses have supported the prosecution case and the pistol that was recovered was in good working condition as per the report of the sergent major and, therefore the appellant may not be granted the privilege of bail.

Having heard the learned counsels for the parties, gone through the records of the case, noted the arguments, gone through the cited bail order and also having gone through the custodial period of the appellant, I am inclined to release the appellant, named above, on bail, during the pendency of this criminal appeal, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Khunti in Sessions Trial Case No. 110 of 2023, arising out of Jariyagarh P.S. Case No. 06 of 2023 ( G.R. Case No. 202 of 2023), subject to the conditions that the appellant will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number befgore the learned Court below which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the Court.

I.A. No. 9281 of 2024 stands allowed and disposed of.

Put up this case in seriatim.

(Ratnaker Bhengra, J) sharda/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter