Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashesh Sinha vs State Of Jharkhand
2024 Latest Caselaw 9598 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9598 Jhar
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Ashesh Sinha vs State Of Jharkhand on 24 September, 2024

Author: Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench: Anubha Rawat Choudhary

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

                                  Cr. Rev. No. 643 of 2018

                   Ashesh Sinha, son of late Sadanand Sinha, aged about 45 years, resident
                   of Noonidih Basti, P.O. Jitpur, P.S. Jorapokhar, District Dhanbad
                                                                ...      ...       Petitioner
                                           Versus
                1. State of Jharkhand
                2. Rohit Kumar Prasad, son Late Sambhu Prasad, resident of Village
                   Darudih, P.O. & P.S. Daru, District Hazaribagh
                3. Shiv Shankar Pasad, son Late Sambhu Prasad, resident of Village
                   Darudih, P.O. & P.S. Daru, District Hazaribagh
                4. Smt. Sita Dan, wife of Late Sambhu Prasad, resident of Village
                   Darudih, P.O. & P.S. Daru, District Hazaribagh (Deleted vide order
                   dated 24.09.2024)
                5. Jadu Devi, Daughter of late Sambhu Prasad, resident of Village
                   Darudih, P.O. & P.S. Daru, District Hazaribagh
                                                   ...        ...        Opposite Parties
                                              ---

CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

---

For the Petitioner : Mr. Awinash Akhouri, Advocate : Mrs. Aditee, Advocate For the Opp. Party Nos.2,3 & 5: Mr. Sandip Kr. Barnwal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prafull Jojo, APP

---

25/24.09.2024 Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. This criminal revision has been filed for the following relief:

"That this criminal revision is against the judgment dated 18.01.2018, passed in Criminal Appeal No.107 of 2015, passed by Shri Sachindra Kumar Pandey, Additional Sessions Judge - XI, at Dhanbad vide order dated 18.01.2018 has pleased to affirm the order dated 29.05.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, in C.P. Case No.1735 of 2011, whereby and whereunder the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, at Dhanbad has pleased to convict the appellant for the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment for 6 months and further compensation of 2.40 lakh, to the complainant."

3. From perusal of I.A. No.3046 of 2024 it appears that the opposite party no.4 has expired. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to delete the name of opposite party no.4 from the cause title.

4. The learned counsels for the parties have submitted that they have filed a joint compromise petition being I.A. No.8842 of 2024 and the matter has been settled out of Court. The learned counsels have submitted that the complainant was Sambhu Prasad, but on account of his death, the matter was ultimately pursued by the opposite party nos.2, 3 and 5. During the pendency of this case, the opposite party no.4 Smt. Sita Dan also expired and the present joint compromise petition has been filed by the opposite party nos.2, 3 and 5, who are the remaining legal heirs and successors of Sambhu Prasad-the complainant. They submit that the matter has been settled on payment of Rs.1,20,000/-.

5. The learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2, 3 and 5 has submitted that they have no surviving grievance against the petitioner and the matter has been settled by the intervention of well-wishers and common friends. He has submitted that they have no objection, if this revision is disposed of in terms of compromise and the conviction of the petitioner is set aside.

6. The learned counsel for the State has submitted that since the conviction is under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, the State has nothing to say in the matter.

7. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the petitioner and the opposite party nos.2, 3 and 5 (the legal heirs and successors of the original complainant) having settled the matter, out of Court and in view of the submissions of the learned counsels for the opposite parties, this criminal revision is disposed of in terms of compromise. The conviction of the petitioner is also set-aside. Accordingly, there is no need for the petitioner to surrender before the court.

8. I.A. No.8842 of 2024 is accordingly disposed of. Other pending I.A are closed.

9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/email.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Saurav/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter