Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gudda Soren @ Guda Soren @ Gura Soren vs The State Of Jharkhand
2024 Latest Caselaw 8758 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8758 Jhar
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Gudda Soren @ Guda Soren @ Gura Soren vs The State Of Jharkhand on 3 September, 2024

Author: Ananda Sen

Bench: Ananda Sen, Gautam Kumar Choudhary

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                        Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No.5 of 2023
                                   -----
           Gudda Soren @ Guda Soren @ Gura Soren, S/o Kusum Soren
                                                              ....Appellant(s).
                                   Versus
           The State of Jharkhand                            .... Respondent(s).
                                   WITH
                        Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No.867 of 2023
                                   -----
           1.Sowan @ Shoban Hansda, S/o Lakhi Hansda
           2.Babu Hansda @ Birhor, S/o Lakhi Hansda          .... Appellant(s).
                                   Versus
           The State of Jharkhand                            ... Respondent(s).
                                   ........
           CORAM        :     SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

SRI GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

------

For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P. .........

05 /03.09.2024: I.A. No.5034 of 2023 in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.867 of 2023 This interlocutory application has been filed by the appellants praying therein to condone the delay 348 days in preferring this appeal.

2. Appellants have preferred this appeal through District Legal Services Committee, Deoghar.

3. After going through the averments made in paras-3, 4, 5 and 6 of the interlocutory application and upon hearing the parties, we are satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for condoning the delay caused in preferring this appeal. We are inclined to allow this interlocutory application. Delay of 348 days in preferring this appeal is condoned.

4. This interlocutory application stands allowed.

5. Admit.

6. The Trial Court Record has already been attached with Criminal Appeal (D.B) No.5 of 2023.

I.A. No.8414 of 2024 in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.5 of 2023 & I.A. No.5035 of 2023 in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.867 of 2023

7. These interlocutory applications have been filed by the appellants, praying therein to suspend the sentence and release them on bail during the pendency of these appeals.

8. The appellants have been convicted for the offence under Section 302/34, 324/34 of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act in connection with Sessions Trial No.55 of 2020. They have been sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence under Section 302/34 of IPC along with other sentences.

9. Heard, learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.P.P. for the State and have gone through the impugned judgment, the evidence and the Trial Court Records.

10. Opportunity was given to the State to oppose the bail, which the State availed and opposed.

11. There is allegation against these appellants that they entered the house of the deceased and branding the deceased to be a witch assaulted her and her husband.

12. P.W.-1 is the informant and the eye witness of this case, who is none, but the husband of the deceased. He stated that he was called out of his house and Sowan @ Shoban Hansda gave a blow on his head. When his wife came out, she was assaulted by all the appellants with iron road. The informant supported the prosecution case, which he stated in the fardbeyan, but while going through the evidence of the Doctor, we find that the Doctor found only one injury on the head of the deceased.

13. Considering that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused and the medical evidence which suggest that there is only one injury on the head, we are inclined to allow these interlocutory applications. Accordingly, upon suspending the sentence, the appellants, namely, Gudda Soren @ Guda Soren @ Gura Soren [Criminal Appeal (D.B) No.5 of 2023], Sowan @ Shoban Hansda and Babu Hansda @ Birhor [Criminal Appeal (D.B) No.867 of 2023] are directed to be released on bail during the pendency of these appeals, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Deoghar in connection with Sessions Trial No.55 of 2020 with a condition that the appellants shall appear and mark their attendance before the Registrar, Civil Court, Deoghar, once in every four months till the disposal of these appeals.

14. Accordingly, I.A. No.8414 of 2024 in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.5 of 2023 & I.A. No.5035 of 2023 in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.867 of 2023 stand allowed.

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

(GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) R.S.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter