Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ganesh Soren vs The State Of Jharkhand ......Opposite ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 9833 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9833 Jhar
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Ganesh Soren vs The State Of Jharkhand ......Opposite ... on 3 October, 2024

Author: Ratnaker Bhengra

Bench: Ratnaker Bhengra

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                       Cr. Revision No. 846 of 2024
          1. Ganesh Soren, aged 16 years, S/O:- late Sonalal Baski, Through his
          Mother and Natural Guardian Bharuti Kisku w/o late Sonalal Baski, aged
          about 41 years, S/O Bepar Baski
          2. Ajit Kisku, aged about 16 years, S/o late Bihari Kisku, Through his
          Mother and Natural Guardian Talamay Hansda, aged about 41 years, W/o
          Bihari Kisku, Both Resident of vill:- Litti, P.O. Pindrahat, P.S.:- Deodanr,
          District:- Godda                                    ...... Petitioner
                                    Versus
          The State of Jharkhand                              ......Opposite party
                                    ----------

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA

-----

For the Petitioner : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, APP .....

Order No.05/ Dated:03.10.2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner has appeared.

The instant revision application is directed against Judgment dated 02/07/2024, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge -1, Godda in Criminal Appeal No.29/2024 whereby and whereunder the learned Appellate Court has been pleased to reject the prayer to release the petitioners on bail and rejected the Criminal Appeal which was filed against the common order dated 19/06/2024, passed in M.C.A. No. 1778/2024, passed by the learned I/C Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Godda in connection with Deodanr P.S. Case No.01/2023 (GR No.544/2023) Enquiry No. 79/2024, registered U/S 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 337, 338, 307 & 384 of I.P.C., Subsequently Section 302 I.P.C. has been added vide order dated 09/01/2023, consequent Enquiry No. 125/2023, whereby and whereunder the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Godda has been pleased to reject the prayer for bail of the petitioners. The case is pending in the court of learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Godda.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioner no. 1 is in custody since 11.01.2023 and petitioner no.2 is in custody since 07.02.2023. She further submits that both the petitioners are minor. She has taken written report in the FIR and raide out from the written report itself and pointed out that the allegation is basically omnibus and general assault by many as seven accused persons and three other unknown persons against the victim who was injured. Counsel says that the assault is not specific to any one of the accused person. Moreover, she has stated that on such basis on the same set of acquisition many other co-accused have already been granted the privilege of bail. It is submitted that Co-accused, Sanjay Kisku in BA No. 4363 of 2023 vide order dated 21st August, 2023 has been granted bail by this Court and Co-accused, Nirmal Baksi, Shivram Hansda, Vikash Hansda in Cr. Revision No.1167 of 2023 vide order dated 12.04.2024 and Sandip Hansda in Cr. Revision No.1143 of 2023 vide order dated 01.11.2023 have been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

Having heard both counsels, noted his submission, petitioners are directed to release on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each by his guardian to the satisfaction of the court of learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Godda in connection with Deodanr P.S. Case No.01 of 2023, subject to condition that (i) the petitioners shall attend each and every date of trial unless it is dispensed with by the learned court below(ii) further thereafter the father or guardian of the minor children will give assurance or undertaking that they will take care of child and also continue with studies. The Secretary DLSA, Godda will take steps for counselling of the juvenile in conflict with law in every three months (iii) any other condition, the learned court below may think fit and proper.

(Ratnaker Bhengra, J.) R.K/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter