Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dudua Marandi vs The State Of Jharkhand
2024 Latest Caselaw 9750 Jhar

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9750 Jhar
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2024

Jharkhand High Court

Dudua Marandi vs The State Of Jharkhand on 1 October, 2024

Author: Ananda Sen

Bench: Ananda Sen

                        Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 520 of 2018
                                    .........
    (Against the judgment of conviction dated 19.03.2018 and order of
   sentence dated 21.03.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions
   Judge-IV, Dumka in Sessions Trial No.22 of 2014).
                               .........
    Dudua Marandi, S/o Late Ghuma Marandi @
    Late Dhuma Marandi, Village- Bankathi,
    P.O.- Dumka(M), District- Dumka, Jharkhand             ..... Appellant
                                        Versus
    The State of Jharkhand                                 .... Respondent
                                  .........

     For the Appellant       : Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                               Mr. Gaurav Priyadarshi, Advocate
                               Ms. Twinkle Rani, Advocate
     For the State           : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl. Public Prosecutor
                                    -----------
                                  PRESENT
                              Sri Ananda Sen, J.
                       Sri Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.
                             JUDGMENT

01.10.2024 By Court.:

The instant criminal appeal is directed against the conviction of the sole appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code vide judgment of conviction dated 19.03.2018 and order of sentence dated 21.03.2018, whereby he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.10,000/-.

2. We have heard, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha and learned counsel for the State, Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha at length.

3. The prosecution case is based on the fardbeyan of informant- Sunil Hansda (P.W.-7), who got the information that his sister has been assaulted in her matrimonial home by this appellant. He along with others, reached the place of occurrence and saw that appellant was assaulting the deceased with fist and slaps and thrashing her. He intervened and sent his injured sister for treatment in Sadar Hospital, Dumka from there he was referred to Suri, but she died on 17.09.2013.

4. On the aforesaid fardbeyan, Dumka (Sadar) P.S. Case No.103 of 2013 was registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The police after investigation filed chargesheet against the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

5. Thereafter the Court took cognizance and committed the case to the Court of Sessions. As the appellant pleaded not guilty, charge was framed under Section 302 of IPC and he was put on trial. Eight witnesses have been examined in this case, who are as follows:-

(i) P.W.-1 Sarju Hansda

(ii) P.W.-2 Suku Marandi @ Suku Murmu

(iii) P.W.-3 Jairam Marandi

(iv) P.W.-4 Dr. Debashish Rakshit

(v) P.W.-5 Chhotu Hansda

(vi) P.W.-6 Manoj Hansda

(vii)P.W.-7 Sunil Hansda, informant of this case

(viii)P.W.-8 Chandrashekhar Singh, Investigating Officer of this case

6. The following documents were also exhibited by the prosecution:-

Exhibit-1 Post Mortem Report Exhibit-2 Formal F.I.R.

Exhibit- 3 Endorsement of written application Exhibit-4 Carbon copy of inquest report Exhibit-5 Memo of arrest Exhibit-6 Forwarding

7. The Trial Court after completion of the prosecution evidence examined this appellant under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. and after hearing the parties, convicted the appellant under section 302 of IPC and sentence as aforesaid P.W.-1, P.W.-2 and P.W.-7 are the eye witness, out of which P.W.-7 is the informant also.

Though P.W.-2 says that he was assaulted by sticks, but the same has not been corroborated by P.W.-1 and P.W.-7.

All these witnesses have stated that they went to the house of this appellant where he saw this appellant assaulting the deceased with fist and slaps and also thrashing her. Thus, from the evidence of these witnesses, the prosecution has been able to prove and establish that this appellant was assaulting the deceased. Another fact, which

has been established that there was no weapon used by the appellant and the assault was only by fist and slaps.

Now, we see the medical evidence.

The Doctor is P.W.-4, who conducted the postmortem of the deceased. He found only two antemortem injuries on the dead body of the deceased:-

"(i) Lacerated wound over the right lower arms 1" x ¼" x skin deep.

(ii)Swelling over forehead. On dissection subcutaneous tissue under scalp found ecchymosed. On opening of skull cranial cavity found filled with blood."

The Doctor had opined that death was due to hemorrhage and shock, as a result of the injury, which was swelling over forehead. In his cross-examination, he stated that the same can happen due to fall on rocky surface.

8. The medical evidence also does not support the statement of P.W.-2, who stated that the deceased was assaulted by stick as if any person who have been assaulted by stick, the mark of such assault would be present in the body, which is not in this case.

The fact remains that the death was due to head injury and P.W.-1 and P.W.-7 are the eye witness. There is nothing to disbelieve them as they stated that the appellant was assaulting the deceased with fist and slaps and thrashing her.

9. Thus, from the evidence, we are of the opinion that this case will not fall within the definition of murder under Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code to punish the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. This case will fall under Part-II of Section 304 of IPC as we find from the evidence that there is nothing to suggest that there was intention to cause death.

10. Thus, from what has been held above, we convert the conviction of the appellant from the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian penal Code to Section 304 Part-II of the Indian Penal Code Since the appellant is in custody for more than ten years, his sentence is also modified to the period which is already undergone.

11. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Appeal is dismissed with aforesaid modification of order of conviction dated 19.03.2018 and order of sentence dated 21.03.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Dumka in Sessions Trial No.22 of 2014.

12. As the appellant is in custody, he shall be released forthwith, if not required in any other case.

13. Let Trial Court Records along with a copy of this judgment be sent to the concerned Trial Court forthwith.

14. Interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of.

(Ananda Sen, J.)

(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.)

High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated 01/10/2024 NAFR /R.S./ Cp 03.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter