Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4838 Jhar
Judgement Date : 3 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 4946 of 2012
1. Ashish Kumar Ghatak
2. Dilip Kumar Singh
3. Raghubir Singh
4. Amrendra Kumar Pandey
5. Vibhuti Bhushan Singh
6. Tarkeshwar Singh ... ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Home Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
3. The Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police,
Jharkhand, Ranchi
4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Jharkhand,
Ranchi
5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Kolhan Range, Chaibasa
6. The Superintendent of Police, Chaibasa... ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
-----
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rishikesh Giri, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Mihir Kunal Ekka, AC to SC-I
-----
Order No. 10 Dated: 03.05.2024
The present writ petition has been filed for quashing
the Resolution dated 31.03.2003 issued by the State of Jharkhand
granting consequential seniority and promotion to the members of
Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe on various posts and in different
grades based on the Government of India Memorandum dated
21.01.2002. Further prayer has been made for issuance of
direction upon the concerned respondent authorities not to grant
reservation in promotion to the members of Schedule Caste &
Schedule Tribe pursuant to amendment made in Article 16(4-A) of
the Constitution of India (85th Amendment) in view of the
judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
"M. Nagaraj Vs. Union of India" reported in (2006) 8 SCC
212, "Surajbhan Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan"
reported in (2011) 1 SCC 467 and "U.P. Power Corpn. Ltd.
Vs. Rajesh Kumar" reported in (2012) 7 SCC 1.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, while producing a
copy of order dated 06.03.2024 passed by learned Division Bench
of this Court in batch of writ petitions led by W.P.(S) No. 5882 of
2003 (Raghubansh Prasad Singh & Ors. Vs. The State of
Jharkhand & Ors.), submits that vide said order, the State of
Jharkhand has been directed not to give effect to the impugned
Resolution dated 31.03.2003 till the rules/guidelines/executive
instructions are issued based on the requirements as mandated by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "M. Nagraj" (supra),
"Jarnail Singh Vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta" (2018) 10 SCC
396, "Jarnail Singh Vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta" (2022) 10
SCC 595 and other related decisions.
3. It is thus submitted that the present writ petition may
also be disposed of in terms with the aforesaid order passed by
learned Division Bench.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
squarely covered by the order dated 06.03.2024 passed by learned
Division Bench of this Court in batch of writ petitions led by
W.P.(S) No. 5882 of 2003, the same is also disposed of in terms
with the said order passed by learned Division Bench.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!