Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4793 Jhar
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Second Appeal No.208 of 2018
------
Baijnath Sao .... .... .... Appellant Versus Kishori Sao .... .... .... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant : Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate Mr. Akash Deep, Advocate For the Respondent :
------
Order No.07 / Dated : 02.05.2024 This second appeal is admitted to be heard on the following substantial question of law:-
"Whether the judgment of lower appellate Court is vitiated on account of non-consideration of Section 44 of T.P. Act- in given fact and situation that admittedly plaintiff has sold half of his share to a stranger who is not a family member."
Appellant will be at liberty to raise further substantial question of law during the course of argument.
Let Lower Court Records be called for from the Court concerned. Let notice be issued to the sole respondent by registered post with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisite etc. must be filed within two weeks of the order.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!