Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arbaz Khan vs The State Of Jharkhand
2023 Latest Caselaw 983 Jhar

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 983 Jhar
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2023

Jharkhand High Court
Arbaz Khan vs The State Of Jharkhand on 28 February, 2023
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                             Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 650 of 2020
                                         .....
         Arbaz Khan                                                  --- --- Appellant
                                           Versus
         The State of Jharkhand.                                     -- --- Respondent
                                        ---

CORAM: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

---

             For the Appellant       : Mr. Mahesh Kr. Sinha, Adv.
             For the State           : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P.
                                        ---

06/28.02.2023         Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Spl.P.P. on

the renewed prayer for suspension of sentence of this appellant made through I.A. No.6079 of 2022.

The sole appellant stands convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 376-D, 379/34 and 506/34 of the I.P.C. by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 20.06.2020 passed in Spl. (Children) Case No.08/2019 by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, Children Court, Simdega and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 20 years with a fine of Rs.20,000/- to be paid to the victim and a default sentence for the offence punishable under Section 376-D of the IPC, RI for three years with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and a default sentence for the offence punishable under Section 379/34 of the IPC and has also been sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and a default sentence for the offence punishable under Section 506/34 of the I.P.C. The appellant being a child in conflict with law was directed to be shifted to place of safety in terms of Section 19(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015 till he attains the age of 21 years vide order of sentence dated 20th June 2020.

The prayer for suspension of sentence was rejected earlier vide order dated 1st July 2021 after going through the lower court records and on merits. Learned counsel for the appellant has renewed the prayer for suspension of sentence primarily on two grounds : (i) that a co-accused Parwej Khan @ Md. Parwej Khan has been enlarged on bail by suspending the sentence by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 7 th April 2022 passed in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.656 of 2020; the said co-accused was tried by the regular court and sentenced to R.I. for 25 years with fine under

the same provisions of Section 376(B) of the I.P.C. The present appellant has been tried by the Children Court being a minor between 16-18 years having committed a heinous offence and has been imposed with a sentence of 20 years with fine under the same provisions. (ii) The appellant has remained in custody for about 4 years and 7½ months as on date. Therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.

Learned Spl.P.P. has opposed the prayer. She submits that reading of the order dated 7th April 2022 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court would show that the appellant no.1 Parwej Khan @ Md. Parwej Khan has been enlarged on bail as his name surfaced only on the confession of the co-convict Arbaz Khan who was named in the F.I.R. by the informant. It is submitted that the present case is therefore distinguishable on facts. Appellant has remained in custody for only 4 years, 7 months and odd days till date against the sentence of life imprisonment and this Court has earlier rejected the prayer on merits. Therefore, prayer may be rejected.

Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the grounds urged by learned counsel for the appellant, it appears that the case of the appellant was considered on independent grounds and on merits by this Court earlier after going through the materials placed from records. The other co-accused who was tried by a regular court namely Parwej Khan @ Md. Parwej Khan has been enlarged on bail because his name surfaced only during confession by a co-convict Arbaj Khan. Apart from that, the appellant has remained in custody for only 4 years and 7 ½ months by now against the sentence of 20 years. Therefore, we are not inclined to grant the privilege of suspension of sentence to the appellant at this stage. As such, prayer is rejected. I.A. No. 6079 of 2022 stands disposed of.

(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Shamim/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter