Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jhupar @ Dindayal Mandal vs Hurwa Mandalain
2022 Latest Caselaw 4367 Jhar

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4367 Jhar
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2022

Jharkhand High Court
Jhupar @ Dindayal Mandal vs Hurwa Mandalain on 2 November, 2022
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                  (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

                              FA No. 131 of 2018
                                   -----
Jhupar @ Dindayal Mandal, son of Manu Mandal, resident of village
Sindarjuri, PO & PS Karmatanr, District-Jamtara          ... .... Appellant
                                Versus
Hurwa Mandalain, wife of Shyamlal Singh, resident of village Singarjuri, PO
& PS Karmatanr District-Jamtara                        ... .... Respondent
                                       -------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
                               ------
   For the Appellant(s)     : Mr. Nityanand Prasad Choudhary, Advocate
   For the Respondent       : Mrs. Rajni Singh, Advocate
                               ------
                            ORDER

nd 2 November 2022 Per, Shree Chandrashekhar,J.

Jhupar @ Dindayal Mandal has filed the present First Appeal against the judgment dated 30 th January 2018 and decree prepared and signed on 9th February 2018 in Original Suit No. 06 of 2014, which was dismissed on contest.

2. The appellant filed an application under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of his marriage solemnized with Hurwa Mandalain about 35 years back on the ground of adultery in respect of which Issue No. (iv) - "Whether the respondent is living in adulterous life with Shyamlal Singh ?" was framed by the Family Court.

3. After the parties entered their appearance, by an order dated 22nd July 2019 they were directed to participate in the mediation exercise at JHALSA.

4. The order dated 11th December 2019 reads as under:

"10/11.12.2019 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that talks for compromise between the parties are underway. He prays for four weeks time so that the matter if amicably settled may be disposed of in that light.

Accordingly, let the case appear after four weeks.

5. On 12th February 2020, the respondent sought adjournment by two weeks to bring on record the settlement arrived at between the parties. However, nothing has been brought on record by either party as regards settlement between them.

6. The matter was thereafter listed on 26 th September 2022,

27th September 2022 and 10th October 2022.

7. The order dated 10th October 2022 reads as under:

"Order No.14/Dated: 10th October 2022 Mrs. Rajni Singh, the learned counsel appears for the respondent and informs the Court that parties have amicably settled their dispute between themselves.

Mr. Nityanand Prasad Choudhary, the learned counsel appears for the appellant and seeks adjournment to get instruction on this issue.

On or before the next date of hearing, the parties may file their respective affidavit, if there is amicable settlement of their dispute.

Post this matter on 2nd November 2022."

8. As would appear from the order dated 10 th October 2022 that on that date also a statement was made on behalf of the respondent that the parties have amicably settled their dispute between themselves. This Court, therefore, directed both the parties to file their respective affidavit, if there is any amicable settlement arrived at between them.

9. Mr. Nityanand Prasad Choudhary, the learned counsel for the appellant, states that a joint compromise petition has been prepared, however, the same could not be filed in time because the appellant did not turn up to swear affidavit.

10. Mr. Nityanand Prasad Choudhary, the learned counsel for the appellant, states that in spite of his instructions the appellant did not turn up to swear affidavit rather he has instructed him to withdraw the present First Appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant further states that telephonic talk with the appellant made today morning has therefore been recorded by him so as to avoid any future resile by the appellant from the oral instructions given by him.

11. In view of the number of adjournments sought by the parties in the present proceeding and the aforesaid developments, we are not inclined to adjourn the matter any further, awaiting the parties to turn up to swear the affidavit.

12. The present First Appeal, in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances in the case, is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)

(Ratnaker Bhengra, J.) Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi Dated: 2nd November, 2022 SB/Nibha-NAFR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter