Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5144 Jhar
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 3704 of 2012
Castron Technologies Ltd. ... ... ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The Damodar Valley Corporation and others... ... Respondents
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
---------
For the Petitioner: Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.N. Sahay, Senior Advocate Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, Advocate
---------
Oral Order 13/Dated: 19.12.2022
This matter was disposed of vide CAV judgment pronounced on
16.12.2022, however, this has been placed before us on the instruction
of the Court in view of a sentence which could not be mentioned in the
judgment, in particular, in paragraph 26 (page no.55) thereof. In the
sub-paragraph of paragraph 26 this Court has already held that the
demand notice requires interference, however, the following sentences
would be added in paragraph 26 by way of last sentence:-
"Accordingly, the demand notice dated 02.07.2012 stands
quashed and set aside."
Accordingly, the order dated 16.12.2022 stands modified to the
extent indicated above.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J.)
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Manoj/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!