Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5037 Jhar
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 6120 of 2022
Mithu Sarkhel ..... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Others ..... Respondents
-----
CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
-----
For the Petitioner: Mr. A. K. Das For Respondent Nos.1-2: Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, A.C to G.P-II
-----
02/12.12.2022 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the
respondents to immediately send all the records relating to election conducted
for the post of Mukhiya of Panchayat-Gharbar-2022, Circle-Baliapur, District-
Dhanbad in Jharkhand Three-Tier-Panchayat (General) Election, 2022 as well as
declaration of final result of the said election, to this Court. Further prayer has
been made for quashing the order dated 17.10.2022 passed by the Sub-
Divisional Officer, Dhanbad-the respondent No.2 (Annexure-3 series to the writ
petition) in Election Application Case No. 13/2022 whereby the said respondent
has allowed the petition filed by the respondent No.3 for fresh counting of votes
for the post of Mukhiya of the said Panchayat.
I.A. No. 11412/2022
The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the
petitioner seeking stay of the operation of the impugned order dated
17.10.2022 passed by the respondent No.2 in Election Application Case No.
13/2022 as well as letter No. 1433 dated 08.12.2022 issued by the Circle
Officer, Baliapur, Dhanbad, during pendency of the present writ petition.
Mr. A. K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, while assailing the
impugned order dated 17.10.2022, submits that the respondent No.2, without
assigning any reason whatsoever, has directed for fresh counting of the votes
for the post of Mukhiya of the said Panchayat merely observing that it is
necessary to clarify the real situation in the interest of natural justice by way of
recounting.
Learned counsel for the petitioner puts reliance on a judgment rendered
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Udey Chand Vs. Surat Singh &
Anr. reported in (2009) 10 SCC 170 and submits that since an order for
inspection and re-counting of the ballot papers affects the secrecy of ballot,
such an order cannot be made as a matter of course. In the entire election
process, the secrecy of ballot is sacrosanct and inviolable, except where strong
prima-facie circumstances to suspect the purity, propriety and legality in the
counting are made out. He further submits that as per his instruction,
re-counting of votes for the post of Mukhiya of the said Panchayat has not yet
been done in terms with the impugned order dated 17.10.2022.
Issue notice.
Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, learned A.C to G.P-II, appears and waives
notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
Issue notice to the respondent No.3 by registered Post with A/D for
which requisites etc. must be filed by 14.12.2022.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a writ petition being
W.P.(C) No. 6003/2022 involving similar issue is pending before this Court and
hence the present writ petition may also be tagged with the same.
In view of the said submission, put up this case on 23.01.2023 along with
W.P.(C) No. 6003/2022.
Till then, there shall be no re-counting/fresh counting of votes for the
election in question in terms with the impugned order dated 17.10.2022 passed
by the respondent No.2 in Election Application Case No. 13/2022 as well as
letter No. 1433 dated 08.12.2022 issued by the Circle Officer, Baliapur,
Dhanbad, if the same has not already been done.
The present interlocutory application stands disposed of.
Satish/- (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!