Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3255 Jhar
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 2421 of 2022
Rahul Kumar Gupta ..... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary, Ranchi & Others
..... Respondents
-----
CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
-----
For the Petitioner: Mr. Subhashis Rasik Soren
For the State: Mr. Mohan Dubey, A.C to A.G
For the JPSC: Mr. Sanjay Piprawall
-----
03/18.08.2022 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the
respondents to follow the mandate as prescribed under Schedule-III, Appendix-
I, Sub-Rule-6 of the Jharkhand Engineering Service Recruitment Rules, 2016
wherein the resolution issued vide memo No. 13026 dated 27.11.2012 has been
adopted which clearly provides for uniform applicability of obtaining minimum
qualifying marks as mentioned against each category in the said memo for the
written competitive examinations (objective/subjective) to be held for all
services/cadres and the minimum qualifying marks has to be calculated
separately for each category against the total marks obtained in all the subjects.
Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the respondent-
Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC), Ranchi to publish the cut-off
marks of the Objective Type Papers which has been fixed by the respondent-
JPSC being qualifying marks for recruitment to the post of Assistant Engineers in
the Mains Examination held pursuant to Advertisement No. 05/2019. The
petitioner has also prayed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to
publish the result of the Mains Examination conducted by the respondent-JPSC
pursuant to Advt. No. 05/2019 category wise by issuing a corrigendum. It is also
prayed for directing the respondent-JPSC to include the petitioner's name for
interview as he being a candidate of BC-II category has obtained the minimum
qualifying marks of 36.5% in Objective/Subjective Type Papers as the quota for
interview is vacant and the mandate of 2.5 times should have been followed
with a further direction to get the interview conducted by the same panel, which
was deputed to take interview between 30.05.2022-12.06.2022. It is jointly submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the issue
raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated
29.06.2022 rendered by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 2420/2022 (Hansraj
Oraon & Ors. Vs. The state of Jharkhand & Ors.) with W.P.(S) No.
2391/2022 (Ravi Shankar Singh & Ors. Vs. The State of Jharkhand &
Ors.) and hence the present writ petition may also be dismissed in terms with
the said judgment.
Considering the said submission of learned counsel for the parties and
also keeping in view that the present case is squarely covered by the judgment
dated 29.06.2022 rendered by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 2420/2022 with
W.P.(S) No. 2391/2022, the present writ petition is also dismissed in terms
with the said judgment.
Consequently, I.A. No. 4565/2022 also stands dismissed.
Satish/- (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!