Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raman Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand
2021 Latest Caselaw 3388 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3388 Jhar
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Raman Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand on 13 September, 2021
                                -1-

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                    I.A. No.3427 of 2021
                           In
             Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No.198 of 2021

     Raman Singh
     @ Khelmohan Singh                        ......      Appellant
                            Versus
     The State of Jharkhand                   .....    Respondent
                            ---------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

---------

For the Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P.

---------

The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objection with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.

03/Dated: 13th September, 2021 I.A. No.3427 of 2021

1. This interlocutory application has been filed under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence and grant of ad-interim bail, to the appellant, during the pendency of the appeal.

2. The appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction dated 02.03.2021 and order of sentence dated 04.03.2021, passed by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge - II, Latehar, in Sessions Trial No.129 of 2017, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Sections 376 and 450 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of eight years, and five years with fine of Rs.5,000/- on each count with the default clause.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has completed half of the sentence. On the above fact, prayer for suspension of sentence has been made.

4. On the other hand, learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for suspension of sentence.

5. Considering the fact that the appellant has completed half of the sentence, as such, I am inclined to suspend the sentence and enlarge the appellant on bail, during the pendency of the appeal, on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge - II, Latehar, in connection with S.T. No.129 of 2017, subject to the condition that the appellant will remain present before the Court when the appeal is taken up for hearing, failing which his bail shall be cancelled.

6. However, the court below before issuing the release order will satisfy itself regarding the fact that the appellant has completed half of the sentence and if not, then no release order will be issued and the matter will be reported to this Court.

7. I.A. No.3427 of 2021 stands disposed off.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Chandan/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter