Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4176 Jhar
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
----
Cr.M.P. No. 1629 of 2019
----
Nandi Sharma @ Nandi Prasad Sharma and Anr. ..... Petitioners
-- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand ...... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate For the Tata Steel :- Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate
----
5/03.11.2021 This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have already vacated the quarter in question. The proceeding
was initiated under section 630 of the Companies Act.
In pursuant to the judgment delivered by the Court the
petitioners have vacated the quarter and N.B.W and processes under
sections 82 and 83 Cr.PC have been issued against the petitioners.
Tata Steel has not filed the affidavit.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, the learned counsel for the O.P.No.2
submits that he will file the affidavit in terms of the earlier order within
one week after vacation.
No coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners in
connection with C/1 Case No.49 of 2003, pending in the court of Special
Judge (Economic Offences), Jamshedpur.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J) SI/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!