Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1034 Jhar
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(L). No. 55 of 2013
----------
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK (Through: Video Conferencing) For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. M.M. Pal, Sr. Advocate
-----------
11/ 01.03.2021 Heard the parties.
Mr. A.K. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vociferously argues that petitioner has been ordered to be reinstated on the sole ground that he has been acquitted in the criminal case, which is not tenable in the eyes of law in the facts and circumstances of the case. In support of his case, learned counsel is armed with plethora of Judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court as well as of this Court.
On the other hand, Mrs. M.M. Pal, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent-workman vehemently opposes the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner and argues that since the petitioner has been acquitted in the criminal case, the petitioner-management cannot ignore the order of the Tribunal by not reinstating the workman.
On the request of learned counsel for the parties, list this case after two weeks i.e. on 22.03.2021, for further hearing.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) kunal/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!