Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dilip Lohra vs The State Of Jharkhand
2021 Latest Caselaw 2148 Jhar

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2148 Jhar
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021

Jharkhand High Court
Dilip Lohra vs The State Of Jharkhand on 1 July, 2021
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1027 of 2018

             Dilip Lohra                                    ---          ---     Appellant
                                              Versus
             The State of Jharkhand                         ---          ---    Respondent
                                                ---
              CORAM:         Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
                         Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
                                  Through:    Video Conferencing
                                                ---
              For the Appellant:       Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate
              For the Respondent:      Mrs. Nily Sahay, A.P.P
                                         ---
05 / 01.07.2021      Heard learned counsel for the appellant Mr. Nilesh Kumar and learned

A.P.P for the State Mrs. Lily Sahay on the renewed prayer for suspension of sentence made on behalf of the appellant through I.A. No. 7597/2019.

2. The sole appellant stands convicted for the offences punishable under sections 363, 366-A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of POCSO Act by the impugned judgment dated 10.08.2018 passed in Sessions Trial No. 190/2015 by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Lohardaga and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- under section 363 of the Indian Penal Code; further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- under section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code and also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code with default sentences. Appellant has also been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- with default sentence under section 4 of POCSO Act, by order of sentence dated 14.08.2018.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that earlier, prayer for bail of the appellant during pendency of this appeal was rejected by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.01.2019 after receipt of the lower court records. However, he submits that the appellant has remained in custody for about three months less than six years by now since the date of his arrest i.e. 26.10.2015. It is submitted that as per the case of the prosecution, victim was a student of Intermediate at the time of occurrence on 22.09.2015. The Medical Board has assessed her age to be 17 to 18 years, as per Ext.7 adduced by the doctor (PW-12), member of the Medical Board. It is submitted that no pregnancy was found in Ultrasonography test. As per the victim (PW-7), she travelled by bus to Ranchi from Lohardaga and then by train to .2 Secunderabad where she was forcibly married and thereafter forcible sexual intercourse was committed upon her. It is submitted that as per the prosecutrix herself, she did not raise shout or cry during her travel to Ranchi by bus and then to Secunderabad by train due to fear, which is unbelievable. As such, appellant who has remained in custody for more than half of the sentence awarded by now, may be enlarged on bail by suspending his sentence.

4. Learned AP.P has opposed the prayer. She submits that the victim was a minor and a student of the first year Intermediate who has been abducted and subjected to forcible sexual intercourse. Therefore, appellant may not be enlarged on bail

5. We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taken into account the materials relied upon by them from the lower court records as also the period of custody undergone till date. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances and that the appellant has remained in custody for about five years eight months and few days by now, we are inclined to enlarge him on bail by suspending his sentence during pendency of this appeal. Accordingly, appellant Dilip Lohra shall be released on bail, during pendency of this appeal, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Lohardaga in Sessions Trial No. 190/2015 with the condition that he and his bailors shall not change their address or mobile nos. without permission of the learned Trial Court. I.A. No. 7597/2019 stands disposed of.

(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J)

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J) Ranjeet/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter