Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1606 Jhar
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 4826 of 2018
Ravi Shankar Prasad. ... ... ... ...Petitioner
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... ... ... ...Respondents
-----------
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK (Through: Video Conferencing) For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate. For the Respondent-State : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, G.A. V. For the Respondent No.5 : Mr. Indranil Bhaduri, Advocate.
-----------
08/ 05.04.2021 Mr. Krishna Murari, learned Counsel for the petitioner assails the
impugned order on the ground that even after six years of retirement the petitioner has
been subjected to major punishment.
Learned Counsel further argues that even without affording any
opportunity and giving the list of documents on which respondents may rely the order
has been passed arbitrarily.
Mr. Murari places heavy reliance on the judgment of this Court, reported
in 2019 (4) JBCJ 94 (Murari Bhagat vrs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.).
However, learned Counsel appearing for the State prays for three weeks'
time for filing counter-affidavit to the amendment writ application.
Prayer is allowed.
Put up this case after three weeks.
[Dr. S.N.Pathak, J.]
P.K.S.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!