Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sheikh Mushtaq vs Mst. Aurath
2026 Latest Caselaw 596 J&K/2

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 596 J&K/2
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench

Sheikh Mushtaq vs Mst. Aurath on 10 February, 2026

Author: Rahul Bharti
Bench: Rahul Bharti
                                             Serial No.176
                                          SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I


 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                    AT SRINAGAR

                CM(M) 39/2026 CM(496/2026)


Sheikh Mushtaq                                     ...Petitioner(s)


Through:   Mr. Manzoor Ul Haq Wani, Advocate


                               Vs.


Mst. Aurath                                        ...Respondent(s)

Through:


CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
                            ORDER

10.02.2026

1. Heard Mr. Manzoor Ul Haq Wani, learned

counsel for the petitioner.

2. The respondent-Mst. Aurath Jan joined by her

two and a half year old daughter-Hareem Jan, has

petitioned the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Srinagar by taking recourse to the provisions of the

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,

2005.

3. In the said complaint, there are two respondents

with respondent No. 1 being Sheikh Mushtaq Ahmad,

the petitioner herein, who has been referred to as the husband of the respondent No. 1-Mst. Aurath Jan and

father of Hareem Jan (minor daughter).

4. The Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar

by virtue of an order dated 04.03.2025 came to admit

the two complainants to interim relief with a direction

to the petitioner to pay Rs. 3,000/- to complainant No.

1- Mst. Aurath Jan (wife) and Rs. 3,000/- to

complainant No. 2-Hareem Jan (minor daughter), thus

aggregating to Rs. 6,000/- per month till ordered

otherwise or till pendency of the petition, whichever is

earlier.

5. In addition, the petitioner along with his father

Ghulam Mohammad Sheikh, who figured as

respondent No. 2, came to be directed to provide

habitable residential accommodation comprising two

rooms with the facility of bathroom and a separate

entrance in favour of the two complainants at

Kakapora, District Pulwama.

6. This interim relief was admitted to the two

complainants whiling putting the petitioner and his

father, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to notice, meaning

thereby that the direction was ex parte ad interim in

nature.

7. Aggrieved of the said indulgence of the Court of

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar, the petitioner

preferred an appeal under Section 29 of the Protection

of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, before

the Court of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge,

Srinagar, who by virtue of his order dated 29.12.2025

came to hold the appeal not maintainable, by holding

that the directions in order dated 04.03.2025 has been

ad-interim ex-parte maintenance subject to objections

from the other side and, therefore, not appealable.

8. Thus, the petitioner was non-suited by the

Appellate Court of the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge,

Srinagar, against which the petitioner has come

forward with the present petition under Article 227 of

the Constitution of India, thereby seeking supervisory

jurisdiction for examination of the legality and validity

of the orders passed by the Courts below.

9. This Court does not want to compound the

financial distress of the respondent herein by putting

her to notice for appearance and contesting the

present petition and, therefore, disposes of this

petition with a direction to the learned Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Srinagar, to undertake the adjudication of

application for interim relief so made by the respondent by soliciting reply/objections thereto from

the petitioner's end and then pass a final order with

respect to grant or non-grant of interim relief as

prayed for in the case.

10. Needful exercise be done by or before 31st March,

2026, and till that time the petitioner shall remain

bound by the direction for monetary maintenance as

awarded in favour of the two

respondents/complainants.

11. However, this Court makes it clear that the

dismissal of the appeal of the appellant by the Court of

3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar, shall not in

any manner be reflective of any observations on the

merits or demerits of the case of either of the parties.

12. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Court of

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar for the sake of

notice and being taken on record.

13. Disposed of.

(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE

SRINAGAR:

10.02.2026 "Mir Arif"

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter