Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 687 J&K/2
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2025
Sr. No. 12
Regular
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CPSW 85/2016 in [SWP 1654/2015]
CM No. 6583/2024
MOHAMMAD AMIN DAR AND ORS. ...Petitioner(s)/appellant(s)
Through: Mr. L.A. Latief, Advocate
Vs.
DEHRAJ KUMAR AND ORS. (POWER ...Respondent(s)
DEVELOPMENT)
Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy. AG.
Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
10.02.2025
In the instant application, the applicants seek substitution of the respondents-contemnors in the Contempt Petition No. 85/2016 in compliance to order dated 21.10.2024. However, upon perusal of the application, it is not forthcoming as to when the order/judgment, the non- compliance of which is alleged of by the applicants, was served upon the respondents-contemnors, who are sought to be substituted, although in para 4 of the application, it is stated that a copy of the judgment/order was delivered to the contemnors in their offices.
In view of the aforesaid vague and ambiguous plea qua the service of judgment/order upon the proposed respondents-contemnors, the counsel for the applicants seeks and is granted two weeks' time to file a supplementary affidavit specifying therein the exact date on which the judgment/order was served upon the proposed contemnors-respondents.
List on 03.03.2025.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 10.02.2025 Junaid
Junaid Ayoub I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!