Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1404 J&K/2
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2025
Serial No.6
REGULAR CAUSE LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
MA 54/2018
c/w CPC 14/2018
CR 39/2018
Masooda Jabeen ...Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Anil Bhan, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Mehjabeena, Advocate
Vs.
Kulwant Singh Johal and Ors. ...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Parimoksh Seth, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER
28.08.2025
1. In terms of an order dated 08.08.2025, this
Court came to set the respondents ex-parte while
registering the plea of Mr. Anil Bhan, learned
Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Ms. Mehjabeen,
Advocate for the appellant that with coming into
force of S.O. 1229 (E) of 2020 dated 31.03.2020,
the respondents, who are the plaintiffs in a civil
suit against the appellant herein (being one of the
three defendants) seeking a decree of right of prior purchase under Jammu & Kashmir Right to Prior
Purchase Act, Svt. 1993 which has come to suffer
repeal by virtue of SO 1229 (E) of 2020 dated
31.03.2020 and the respondents have lost their lis
by roots and branches, and, therefore, the suit
instead of being kept on board ought to have been
dismissed because of passing of SO 1229 (E) of
2020 dated 31.03.2020 and, accordingly, even
this appeal which is otherwise addressed against
an interim injunctory order of the court of
Additional District Judge, Jammu stood
infructuous because of loss of original lis to the
plaintiffs/respondents.
2. In this regard, Mr. Anil Bhan, learned Senior
Counsel had drawn the attention of this Court to
judgments of the coordinate Benches of this Court
in the cases of "Abdul Samad Bhat and Anr. Vs.
Javid Ahmad Hakak and Ors." in RP No. 58/2025
in CFA No. 139/2017, " Mohammad Jamal Parray
Vs. Ghulam Qadir Mir and Ors." in CR No. 32/2022
and "Sukhdev Singh and Ors. Vs. Arun Prakash
and Ors." in CSA No. 30/1995.
3. Mr. Sunil Sethi, learned Senior Counsel
assisted by Mr. Parimoksh Seth, Advocate on
behalf of the respondents who are otherwise ex-
parte, submits that the lis is salvageable. This
Court would have determined the fate of the civil
suit of the respondents along with the fate of the
present appeal in the light of the aforecited
judgments of the coordinate Benches, but Mr.
Sunil Sethi, learned Senior Counsel submits that
he would distinguish the said judgments in terms
of their application to the facts of the present case
and, therefore, seek indulgence of this Court to
grant him one opportunity.
4. List in continuation on 02.09.2025 in the
Daily Supplementary Causelist.
5. Interim direction, if any, to continue till next
date of hearing.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
28.08.2025 "Mir Arif"
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!