Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cm(M) No. 253/2023 vs Mohammad Saleem Rather
2023 Latest Caselaw 1248 j&K/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1248 j&K/2
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2023

Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench
Cm(M) No. 253/2023 vs Mohammad Saleem Rather on 4 October, 2023
                                                                  Item No. 162
                                                                  Supp. List
              HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                           AT SRINAGAR

                             CM(M) No. 253/2023.
Ghulam Mohi-ud-din Naikoo & Ors.
                                                     ...Petitioner(s)
                      Through:   Mr. Rizwan-ul-Zaman Bhat, Advocate.
                                         Vs
Mohammad Saleem Rather.
                                                                 ... Respondent(s)
                      Through:
CORAM:       HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
                                 JUDGMENT

04.10.2023

1. In the instant petition, petitioners are seeking a direction upon the

learned Sub-Judge/ Chief Judiial Magistrate, Anantnag (Trial Judge) to

decide their application filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC for

deleting them from the array of defendants in the suit titled as

Mohammad Saleem Rather v. Gh. Mohi-ud-din Naikoo and others

expeditiously.

2. The brief facts are summarized as under:

It is stated that the one Zahid Rasool Naikoo S/O Gh. Rasool

Naikoo R/O Nipora Anantnag Tehsil and District, Anantnag,

Kashmir is the partner of a stone cruser being run under the name

and style of M/s Mehak Stone Crusher situated at Sadoora

Pethbugh enar Sadoora bridge, Anantnag in the ratio of

60%:40%. The respondent and the said Zahid Rasool are

contesting a case before the Court of Pr. District and Sessions

Judge, Anantnag regarding the recovery of an amount of Rs.

25,26,500.00 filed by the respondent against the said Zahid

Rasool naikoo. The said suit is at the stage of arguments and on

the application seeking leave to defend the suit. The respondent

has filed a suit before the court of learned Trial Judge and has

wrongly arrayed the petitioners as party defendants in the suit.

The petitioners are neither necessary nor proper party in the suit.

3. It is stated that on 21.06.2023, respondents had obtained an order

of restraint in the said suit whereby the petitioners have been

restrained jointly and severally from causing any sort of

interference with the partnership concern operating under the

name and style of M/S Mehak Stone Crusher Pethbugh Sadoora,

Anantnag, Kashmir. In the said suit SHO Police Station

concerned has been directed to ensure the implementation of

order dated 21.06.2023. It is stated that the respondent has

obtained one more order on 01.08.2023, in the above said suit

whereby the Dy.S.P, Anantnag has been directed to ensure the

implementation of order dated 21.06.2023.

4. It is stated that the petitioners have not violated any interim order

passed by the learned Trial Judge but the police concerned have

been calling the petitioner of and on to police station. The

petitioners have no concern with the partnership concern of the

respondent and Zahid Rasool Naikoo. The petitioners 1 & 3 are

paternal uncles of Zahid Rasool naikoo who have separated from

the joint family twenty years ago. The petitioner No. 1 is working

as contractual lecturer in Government Degree College Boys

Anantnag whose educational qualification is Ph.D and is very

often receiving calls from unknown numbers directing him to

attend the police Station/Police post which is carrying adverse

effect upon the career of the petitioner No. 1. The petitioner No.

2 is a contractor and is earning his livelihood by putting hard

labour is also being harassed by the police on one pretext or the

other.

4. It is further stated that petitioners have moved an application before the

court below on 19.08.2023, under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC for their

deletion from the array of defendants in the suit, however, the court

below has not decided the application as on date.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners would feel

satisfied, if this petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned

Trial Judge to decide the application of the petitioner filed under Order

1 Rule 10 (2) CPC expeditiously

8. Be that as it may, the instant petition is disposed of at the threshold

with a request to the Sub-Judge/ Chief Judiial Magistrate, Anantnag to

decide the application of the petitioners dated 19.08.2023 filed under

Order 1 Rule 10 (2) CPC for their deletion from the array of

respondents in the suit tiled Mohammad Saleem Rather v. Ghulam

Mohi-ud-din Naikoo & Ors. within a period of two months from the

date certified copy of this order is served upon the learned Sub-Judge/

Chief Judiial Magistrate, Anantnag, in accordance with law.

9. Disposed of.

(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 4th October , 2023.

Ab. Rashid

Whether the order is reportable Yes/No.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter