Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1187 j&K
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2021
Sr. No. 43
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 621/2019
Samitri Devi and ors. .... Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. H.R Qureshi, Advocate.
V/s
Abdul Majid Bhat and ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate
vice
Mr. S.S Nanda, Sr.AAG.
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks non-compliance of
the order/judgment dated 03.10.2018, by virtue of which respondents
were directed to determine the eligibility of the petitioners to claim the
compensation and to determine the rates of compensation in accordance
with the applicable SROs on the subject.
Respondents have filed the statement of facts and have stated
that they have considered the case of the petitioners and vide order dated
18.10.2019 rejected the case of the petitioner being devoid of merits.
In view of the compliance of the order dated 03.10.2018,
nothing survives in this contempt petition for adjudication. Proceeding
this contempt petition are, accordingly, closed. However, the petitioners
are free to assail this order in case the cause survives.
(Sindhu Sharma) Judge JAMMU TARUN KUMAR GUPTA 2021.09.24 21:51 24.09.2021 Tarunand I attest to the accuracy integrity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!