Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1442 j&K
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2021
Sr. No. 72
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CPOWP No. 38/2013
Sami Ul Rehman ....Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Rajeshwar Singh S.S. P. Jammu ....Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
Incumbent against whom instant petition has been filed, might have retired
or been transferred to some other office. In such circumstances, keeping
contempt petition pending would serve no advantageous purpose.
In the above backdrop, contempt petition is closed. However, petitioner
shall be free to approach the incumbent in office with a copy of the
order/judgment, with respect whereof instant petition has been filed, for its
implementation, unless already complied with. It is made clear here that in the
event petitioner feels unsatisfied qua implementation of the directions of this
Court, petitioner shall be free to file appropriate proceedings for compliance
thereof in accordance with law.
Contempt petition is, accordingly, closed.
(Vinod Chatterji Koul) Judge Jammu:
11.11.2021 RENU BALA Renu 2021.11.15 13:53 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!