Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 206 j&K
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2021
103
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
RFA No. 7/2021
Union of India and another ...Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Sunil Malhotra, CGSC
v/s<
Kewal Krishan and others
't
.....Respondent (s)
Through :- Ms. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate
for Nos. 1 to 5
Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate for No. 6
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants against
the award dated 28.10.2013 passed in reference under section 18 of the Land
Acquisition Act and by virtue of the impugned award, the learned District
Judge Rajouri assessed the compensation of the acquired land of
Rs. 40,000/- per kanal. The facts emanating from the record reveal that the
award was issued by the Collector Land Acquisition on 03.03.1999 wherein
the compensation was assessed of Rs. 20,000 per kanal and Rs. 18,000/- per
kanal for cultivable land and uncultivable land respectively.
2. Feeling aggrieved, the owners filed the objections, those were
referred to the District Judge, Rajouri. After considering the pleadings and
evidence by the parties, learned District Judge, Rajouri assessed the
compensation at the rate of Rs. 40,000/- per kanal.
3. Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, learned counsel for the respondents
submits that same award issued by the Collector Land Acquisition on
03.03.1999 was also the subject matter of consideration before this Court in
CFA No. 08/2016, titled, Union of India and others vs. Sohan Lal and others
that was disposed of on 31.05.2018 assessing the compensation of Rs.
50,000/- per kanal for cultivable land and Rs. 40,000/- per kanal for
uncultivable land. Again same award was subject of another appeal bearing
CIMA No. 326/2013 that was disposed of on 23.10.2019 in which the above
mentioned judgment passed in CFA No. 08/2016 was relied upon and the
appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed. The subject matter of this
appeal is also the same and the learned District Judge, Rajouri has
determined the compensation at the rate of Rs. 40,000/- per kanal. As both
the judgments have attained finality, so the present appeal also deserves to
be dismissed, particularly in view of the fact that the appellants' counsel has
not disputed the aforementioned fact.
4. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE JAMMU 26.02.2021 Rakesh Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!