Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 102 j&K
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2021
Sr. No. 214
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: CDLOW No. 30 of 2016
Yash Pal Singh ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: None.
v/s
State and others .... Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, JUDGE
ORDER
1. The case has been called out but none has appeared for either of the
parties. Therefore, the matter deserves to be dismissed for want of prosecution.
We have otherwise considered the matter on merits and find that it relates to
the review petition which has been filed with delay.
2. The review application has been filed with the delay of more than
400 days. We have considered the application for condoning the delay in filing
the review application. The aforesaid application simply states that after the
pronouncement of the judgment sought to be reviewed, the petitioner was
mentally disturbed and as such could not seek advice in time to file the review
application. The explanation falls short of his stating as to the time period in
which the petitioner had remained mentally disturbed or as to at what point of
time he took legal advice for the purposes of filing the present review
application. The application for condoning the delay has been filed most
casually in a slipshod manner without giving any adequate and appropriate
reason.
3. Accordingly we do not deem it necessary to condone the delay in
filing the review application. Delay Condonation application No.30/2016 is
rejected and consequently review petition No. 23/2021 is dismissed as barred
by time.
(DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR) (PANKAJ MITHAL)
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu
10.02.2021
Raj Kumar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!