Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1679 j&K
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2021
Sr. No. 4
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: CPLPA No. 31 of 2016
Mohinder Pal and Others .....Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Sh. Vikram Sharma, Sr. Advocate with
Sh. Jattan Singh Gill, Advocate.
v/s
G. Mohan Kumar and Others .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Sh. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG.
Sh. L. K. Moza, CGSC
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
01. The petitioners have initiated contempt proceedings on account of
disobedience of the judgment and order dated 17.03.2015 passed in LPAOW
No. 30/2014.
02. The Appellate Court by the aforesaid judgment and order affirmed the
judgment of the learned Single Judge holding that the land in question is under
occupation of the Army and the Army is liable for payment of rental
compensation which was paid upto the year 2003 and, therefore, compensation
from the year 2003 onwards upto March 2015 is liable to be paid. Accordingly,
direction was issued to the Deputy Commissioner, Rajouri, to assess the rent of
the land and it was made clear that the disbursement of the said compensation,
so determined and deposited, shall be made to the rightful owners of the land
after proper verification.
03. In confirming the aforesaid judgment, the Division Bench directed that
the arrears of rent from 2003 upto 2015 be deposited within the extended
period of three months and that the Army shall continuously deposit the rent as
already directed as long as the land remains in its occupation.
04. An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Army stating that the rental
compensation up to 31st March 2021 has been deposited with the Deputy
Commissioner, Rajouri.
05. The court vide order dated 07.07.2021 has required the Deputy
Commissioner, Rajouri, to furnish a detailed affidavit as to why the amount
deposited from the year 2003 to March 2020 has not been disbursed to the
owner till now. In pursuance of the above direction, the Deputy Commissioner
has filed affidavit indicating various reasons for not distributing the
compensation and one of the reasons is that part of the land falls in the Pakistan
Occupied Kashmir and for the land which is on the Indian side, it is not
possible to go on the spot as there is danger of mines being exploded and, as
such, it is next to impossible to verify the ownership of the land.
06. We fail to understand how the ownership rights of any party can be
verified by going on the spot or on the land. This can be done on the basis of
revenue records or by collecting the revenue documents from the various
parties including the petitioners or by demanding the title deeds.
07. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is clear that Army is liable
for the payment of rental compensation for the land in question till the same is
in its occupation and that the Army has deposited the rental compensation upto
March 2021 but same is not being distributed by the Deputy Commissioner,
Rajouri, due to proper verification of the rightful owners entitled to receive the
compensation. The explanation forwarded by the Deputy Commissioner
appears to be an eye wash and not very convincing.
08. In view of the above, we direct the Deputy Commissioner, Rajouri, to
personally attend the court on 15th March 2022 so that charge may be framed
against him for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of the court
causing interference in the administration of justice.
09. List on 15th March 2022.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) (PANKAJ MITHAL)
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
JAMMU
14.12.2021
SUNITA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!