Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 499 j&K
Judgement Date : State Of J&K vs
S. No.217
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
Crl LP No. 64/2019
c/w
CrlA (AS) No. 19/2019
(Through Video Conferencing)
State of J&K ...Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Aseem Sawhney, AAG
v/s
<
't
Tariq Hussain .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Sidhant Gupta, Advocate
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
Crl LP No. 64/2019
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the
impugned judgment.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that even though
family members of the deceased have supported the case of the prosecution, yet
the learned trial Court has disbelieved their statements on the ground that their
statements have not been corroborated by independent witnesses. This
observation of the learned trial Court, according to learned counsel for the
petitioner, is not in accordance with law.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to
the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, a case for grant of
leave to file appeal is made out. The application is, therefore, allowed and the
petitioner is granted leave to file appeal against the impugned judgment.
Main appeal is taken on Board.
CrlA (AS) No. 19/2019
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
The appeal is admitted to hearing.
Record of the trial Court be summoned.
Registry shall prepare the paper book and process the case for final
hearing.
List on 26.07.2021.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU 22.04.2021 Paramjeet
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!