Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 470 j&K
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2021
S. No.227
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
Bail App 155/2020
Sageera Bi Th. Abdul Hamid ...Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Rameshwar P Sharma, Advocate
v/s <
Union Territory of J&K and another
't
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
Reply to the bail application stands filed on behalf of the
respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in the case neither
victim nor the informant has been made a party to the proceedings which is
necessary in view of the Judgment of this Court in case titled Badri Nath vs.
Union Territory of J&K ( Bail App No. 139/2020 decided on 11.12.2020 ). He
has further stated that in terms of the provisions contained in Section 439 (1A)
Cr.P.C, the presence of informant or any person authorized by him is obligatory
at the time of hearing of a bail application of instant nature.
In view of what has been submitted by learned counsel for the
respondents informant who also happens to be the father of victim is directed to
be made a party in these proceedings. Accordingly, Ferooz Din s/o Mir Mohd
r/o Village Marhote, Tehsil Surankot District Poonch is impleaded as respondent
No. 3 to these proceedings.
Learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the amended memo of
parties.
Notice be issued to newly added respondent through concerned
police station.
List on 28.05.2021.
Meanwhile, interim direction, if any, to continue till next date of
hearing.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU 12.04.2021 Bir
BIR BAHADUR SINGH 2021.04.16 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!