Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5086 HP
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 28th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SABINA
CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 6723 of 2021
Between:
SHANKAR SINGH THAKUR, ALIAS
SHANKAR DASS, AGED 57-1/2 YEARS, S/O
SHRI GOVIND RAM, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE SAI NORUWAN, P.O.
SHICKROHA, VIA NAMHOL, TEHSIL AND
DISTRICT BILASPUR, H.P.
......PETITIONER
(BY MR. AJAY SHARMA, SENIOR
ADVOCATE WITH MR. ATHRAV SHARMA,
ADVOCATE.)
AND
HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORT
CORPORATION LTD., OLD BUS
STAND, SHIMLA-171003, THROUGH ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR.
...RESPONDENT
(BY MS. SHUBH MAHAJAN,
ADVOCATE.)
____________________________________________________
::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:14:17 :::CIS
-2-
This petition coming on for admission this day,
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq, passed the following:
.
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed by Shankar Singh
Thakur alias Shankar Dass, praying for a direction to the
respondent-Corporation to promote him as Sub Inspector on
and w.e.f. 31.08.2019, the date on which his immediate junior
was promoted, with all consequential benefits alongwith interest
@ 9% per annum.
2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner invited our
attention to the proceedings of the Review Departmental
Promotion Committee (RDPC), which consisted of Divisional
Manager (Traffic) as its Chairman, Regional Manager (Legal)
and Assistant Controller F&A (Booking), as its Members, held
on 28.01.2020 (Annexure P-1), The Review Committee
recommended the case of the petitioner for promotion to the
post of Sub Inspector from the date on which his immediate
junior was promoted. Earlier on 09.07.2019, the petitioner was
not found fit for promotion as penalty was in operation against
him. Later, he was exonerated of all the charges leveled
against him vide Charge Sheet No. 1261, dated 25.10.2004 and
Penalty Order No. 15851, dated 19.12.2008 were also set
aside. The Review DPC also held that the report submitted by
the Regional Manager, HRTC, Taradevi, in which it had been
.
stated that a criminal case had been filed against the petitioner
before the Court on 28.08.2019, cannot be considered being
extraneous matter because it did not exist at the time of original
DPC.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has placed
reliance on the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Union of India & others versus K.V. Jankiraman &
others, reported in (1991)4 SCC 109, wherein it has been held
that once the Review DPC has recommended the case of an
employee for promotion, the same has to be given effect to.
4. However, learned Counsel for the respondent
seeks time for filing reply to the writ petition, but in our
considered view, it would be just and appropriate, if the
petitioner is granted a liberty to file a representation before the
respondent and the respondent-Corporation takes a final view
on the recommendation of the Review Committee and pass an
appropriate order. Accordingly, we dispose of the writ petition,
requiring the petitioner to file a representation before the
respondent-Managing Director, Himachal Road Transport
Corporation Ltd., alongwith a copy of this order, within a period
of one week from today and directing the said respondent to
decide the same, within a period of 10 days thereafter, in light of
.
the recommendations of the Review DPC.
5. The pending application(s), if any, stands disposed
of.
( Mohammad Rafiq ) Chief Justice
( Sabina ) Judge October 28, 2021 (hemlata)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!