Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1894 HP
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2021
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.1049/2021
.
Decided on: 09.03.2021
Shamaoon ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & others . ..Respondents.
....................................................................................... Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath, Judge. Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
___________________________________________________________
For the petitioner : Mr. P.K. Verma, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Mr. Anil
Jaswal, Additional Advocates General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Ravi Malimath Judge (Oral)
The petitioner seeks a relief to direct respondent No.1
to take action against respondent No.2, who has failed to perform
his statutory duties having not taking any action against
respondent No.3, despite a written complaint.
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. Learned Deputy Advocate General, submits that the
matter has been settled amicably, which information, the
.
petitioner has suppressed.
3. Be that as it may, there is an adequate remedy
available to the petitioner under the provisions of Code of
Criminal Procedure. He is entitled to lodge a complaint under
Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the
concerned Magistrate. Hence, we do not find any merit in the
instant writ petition and the same is dismissed. Pending
miscellaneous application is also disposed off accordingly.
( Ravi Malimath )
Judge
( Jyotsna Rewal Dua ) Judge
March 09, 2021 (rohit/vs)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!