Jagdish Raj vs Himachal Road Transport ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 1111 HP

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
                                       CWP No. 842 of 2021
                          Decided on: 18th February, 2021
    ____________________________________________________________




                                                                             .
    Jagdish Raj





                                                     ....Petitioner
                          Versus





    Himachal Road Transport Corporation Ltd. and others
                                                   ...Respondents
    _____________________________________________________________
    Coram





    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge
    1Whether approved for reporting?
    ______________________________________________________
    For the petitioner:
                        r    Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate.

    For the respondents:                   Mr. Vikas Mishra, Advocate vice
                                           Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Advocate
                                           THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING



    Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (oral)

CMP No.1488 of 2021

Allowed and disposed of.

CWP No.842 of 2021

2. Mr. Vikas Mishra, Advocate appearing vice for the

respondents, under instructions of Standing Counsel

Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Advocate, waives service of notice

on behalf of the respondents. On the basis of instructions

imparted to him on behalf of the respondents, he further

admits that the present case is squarely covered by

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

judgment dated 17.7.2014 passed by this Court in CWP

No. 3050 of 2014 titled as Nek Ram Versus State of

Himachal Pradesh and others, as claimed by the petitioner

.

in the petition.

3. In view of above, the present petition is disposed

of with the observation that judgment passed in

CWP No.3050 of 2014 (supra) shall be applicable mutatis

and mutandis to the present case and accordingly the

respondents r are directed to release all the pensionary/

retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of three

months from today and thereafter pension to the petitioner

shall be released regularly on the first day of each month and

petitioner shall also be entitled for interest on pensionary

benefits @ 9% per annum from due date.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), shall also

stand disposed of with no order as to costs.

The petitioner is permitted to produce copy of order

downloaded from the High Court website and the respondents

shall not insist for certified copy of the order, however, they may

verify the order from the High Court website or otherwise.

Dasti copy on usual terms

(Vivek Singh Thakur) Vacation Judge February 18, 2021 ( Gaurav)

.