Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4187 HP
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ON THE 26th DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
EXECUTION PETITON No. 303 OF 2021
Between:
SH. DEVI SINGH SON OF
LATE SH. KHAYALI RAM, R/O
VILLAGE, KHARAL, POST OFFICE,
BAGSHAR, TEHSIL KARSOG,
DISTRICT MANDI, H.P.
....PETITIONER
(BY. SH. DEVENDER SHARMA, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY (I&PH) TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL
PRADESH.
2. ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, HIMACHAL
PRADESH I& PH DEPARTMENT,
SHIMLA-02.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENTING
ENGINEER, I&PH DEPARTMENT,
CIRCLE, SUNDERNAGAR, DISTRICT
MANDI, H.P.
4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, I&PH,
JAL SHAKTI DIVISION, KARSOG,
DISTRICT MANDI, H.P.
....RESPONDENTS
(BY SH. SUDHIR BHATNAGAR AND SH.
DESH RAJ THAKUR, ADDITIONAL
ADVOCATE GENERALS WITH SH.
KAMAL SHARMA, DEPUTY ADVOCATE
GENERAL, FOR R-1 TO 4)
Whether approved for reporting?
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court passed the following:
::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 22:57:47 :::CIS
2
ORDER
By way of instant Execution Petition filed under Rule 16 of
.
the H.P. High Court Original Side Rules, prayer has been made on
behalf of the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents to
implement/ execute the judgment dated 2.11.2020, passed by this
Court in CWP No.2110 of 2020, titled as Devi Singh versus State of
Himachal Pradesh and others.
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid judgment, alleged to have been
violated, (Annexure P-1), reveals that this Court while allowing the
petition directed the respondents to release the pension in favour of the
petitioner from the due date alongwith consequential benefits, but
since needful has been not done till date, petitioner has approached
this Court in the instant proceedings.
3. Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, learned Additional Advocate
General representing the respondents while accepting notice on behalf
of the respondents states that though he has every reason to believe
and presume that by now aforesaid judgment alleged to have been
violated, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be
complied with within a period of two weeks from today.
4. Consequently, in view of the fair statement made by
learned Additional Advocate General representing the respondents, this
Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and as such,
same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents
to do the needful in terms of judgment dated 2.11.2020, passed by this
Court in CWP No.2110 of 2020, positively within a period of two
weeks, if not already done, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty
.
to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in
accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the
judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings.
26th August, 2021 (Sandeep Sharma),
(shankar) Judge
r to
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!