Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4014 HP
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
ON THE 19th DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL
EXECUTION PETITION NO.91 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
AJIT SINGH DIWAN, SON OF
SHRI TULSI RAM, AGED 73
YEARS, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE TULSI NIWAS, BASU
KATUR, MEHRE, TEHSIL
BARSAR, DISTRICT
HAMIRPUR, H.P.
....PETITIONER.
(BY MR. BHUVNESH SHARMA, MR. RAMAKANT SHARMA AND
MR. JAI RAM SHARMA, ADVOCATES)
AND
1. THE SECRETARY
EDUCATION, GOVT. OF
HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA.
2. DIRECTOR HIGHER
EDUCATIN, HIMACHAL
PRADESH, LALPANI,
SHIMLA.
....RESPONDENTS/STATE.
(BY MR. ASHOK SHARMA, ADVOCATE GENERAL, WITH
MR. ADARSH SHARMA, MR. SUMESH RAJ,MR. SANJEEV
SOOD, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATES GENERAL AND WITH MR.
J.S. GULERIA, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL)
Whether approved for reporting?1No
This Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court passed the following:
::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 22:55:04 :::CIS
2
JUDGMENT
The primary grievance of the petitioner is with regard to
.
the non consideration of his name for promotion from the post of
TGT (Trained Graduate Teacher), Arts, to the post of TGT, Sociology,
for which promotion the petitioner is eligible, though his juniors
have been considered for promotion to the said post.
2. In the considered view of the Court, this grievance
cannot be redressed by way of the present Execution Petition as the
order which was passed in the Original Application, filed by the
present petitioner before learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh
Administrative Tribunal, i.e. O.A.No.7423 of 2018, titled as Ajit
Singh Diwan Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another,
decided on 08.01.2019, was to consider his case and confer upon
him the benefits in terms of the judgment passed in CWP(T) No.8920
of 2008, titled as Himachal Pradesh Rajkiya Padonnat Prashikshit
Santak Adhyapak Sangh and others Versus State of Himachal
Pradesh & others, decided on 21.12.2010, which judgment in fact
dealt with the issue of promotion of the members of the petitioner-
union therein from the post of JBT to the post of TGT intra 25%
quota belonging to that particular criteria.
3. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this
petition, but with liberty to initiate appropriate legal proceedings
including writ for the redressal of his above grievance.
.
4. Petition is permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty as
prayed for. Petition stands disposed of, so also pending
miscellaneous applications, if any.
August 19, 2021 (Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
(rishi)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!