Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3640 HP
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 5057of 2020
.
Decided on: 05.08.2021
Mayadhar Sharma ...Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents
_____________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1 No.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr.
Hemanshu Misra, Addl. A.Gs. and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy. A.G.
(Through Video Conferencing)
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since
respondent No. 5 has been adjusted at the same station, therefore,
the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as
having been rendered inructuous. Pending application(s), if any,
also stand(s), disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
(Satyen Vaidya)
5 th
August, 2021 Judge
(sanjeev)
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!