Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashokbhai Gorkharam Jaat vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1471 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1471 Guj
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Ashokbhai Gorkharam Jaat vs State Of Gujarat on 20 March, 2026

Author: Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
                                                                                                               NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/CR.MA/6594/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

                                                                                                               undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                               R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                          CHARGESHEET) NO. 6594 of 2026

                        ==========================================================
                                                        ASHOKBHAI GORKHARAM JAAT
                                                                  Versus
                                                            STATE OF GUJARAT
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR N R DESAI(6504) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MR ADITYA JADEJA ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
                        No. 1
                        ==========================================================

                             CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                                             Date : 20/03/2026

                                                               ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr.N.R.Desai appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Aditya Jadeja appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11996005250237 of 2025 registered with Suigam

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6594/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

Police Station, District: Vav-Tharad for the offence punishable under Sections 65-AE, 116(B), 98(2) of the Prohibition Act and under Section 281 of the BNS Act and under Sections 177, 184, 134 of the M.V.Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that since the charge-sheet is filed no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6594/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:-

i. Allegation that the applicant had transacted prohibited liquor.

ii. The allegation being that the applicant had abandoned the vehicle which he was driving and whereas, while the vehicle itself had been seized in the month of October, 2025, the applicant had been arrested on 08.01.2026.

iii. Apprehension of the learned APP that the applicant is not being resident of the State of Gujarat, if released, he may abscond, could be allayed by imposing suitable conditions.

iv. The fact that the charge-sheet having been laid and the fact that the applicant having no antecedents.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6594/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No. 11996005250237 of 2025 registered with Suigam Police Station, District: Vav-Tharad, on executing a bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6594/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

[e] furnish the proposed address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court in the State of Gujarat at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior intimation to the I.O.;

[f] mark presence once in a month for a period of six months before the concerned police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicant for being released on regular bail.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6594/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

undefined

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) NAIR SMITA V./05-DB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter