Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dilipsinh Kishorsinh Chauhan vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 774 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 774 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Dilipsinh Kishorsinh Chauhan vs State Of Gujarat on 25 February, 2026

Author: Sunita Agarwal
Bench: Sunita Agarwal
                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                              C/WPPIL/234/2013                                ORDER DATED: 25/02/2026

                                                                                                             undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                               R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 234 of 2013

                        ==========================================================
                                                   DILIPSINH KISHORSINH CHAUHAN
                                                                Versus
                                                      STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR BM MANGUKIYA(437) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Opponent(s) No. 10,12,14,18,20,21
                        DHARMESH D NANAVATY(2396) for the Opponent(s) No. 8
                        DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Opponent(s) No. 11,15,16,17,6
                        MS HETAL PATEL, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
                        Opponent(s) No. 1,2,3,4
                        MR AMAR D MITHANI(484) for the Opponent(s) No. 19
                        MR ANKIT SHAH(6371) for the Opponent(s) No. 9
                        MR HARSHEEL D SHUKLA(6158) for the Opponent(s) No. 7
                        MR VIRAT G POPAT(3710) for the Opponent(s) No. 13
                        ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.
                              JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL
                              and
                              HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY

                                                        Date : 25/02/2026

                                                         ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)

1. The present petition has been filed in the nature of

public interest litigation in the year 2013 with the following

prayers:-

"39(A) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, and to direct either the Union of India or the Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct an inquiry and lodge FIR after holding inquiry against the persons who

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/WPPIL/234/2013 ORDER DATED: 25/02/2026

undefined

found to be culprit in illegal excavation of the mineral - limestone in the villages as mentioned in the body of the petition;

(B) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, and to direct the State Government to place on record what actions have been taken by the State Government, more particularly by the Collector, Porbandar, what steps and proceedings have been further undertaken in pursuance of the order passed by the revisional authority and the Union of India in relation to cases mentioned in the body of this petition.

(C) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, and to order to appoint any officer who shall not be holding rank below the Collector, who shall be entrusted to decide and determine all the cases which have been remanded by the Union of India back to the State Government in case of alleged theft of mineral -

limestone, the details of which have been given in the body of the petition.

(D) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/ or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, and to direct that National Remote Sensing Centre, Hyderabad, and Indian Bureau of Mines, Nagpur, to place on records all data of the imagery from the year 2000 to 2013 and place the data of the excavation of the minerals has taken place during this period of the area

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/WPPIL/234/2013 ORDER DATED: 25/02/2026

undefined

which is consisted of villages Ranavav, Adityana, Boricha, Bakharla and Katvana, consisted of about 21 kms.

(E) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/ or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, and to direct the concerned authorities as may be deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court to take action in pursuance of the data so submitted by the National Remote Sensing Centre, Hyderabad and Indian Bureau of Mines, Nagpur.

(F) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the State Government to place on records what steps have been taken by the State Government in pursuance of the order passed by the revisional authority in the revision applications so mentioned in the body of this petition.

(G) Pending hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court will be pleased to appoint some officer not to below the rank of Collector, who shall not be in the influence of the Government to take action in accordance with law in relation to the revisional orders recorded by the Union of India;

(H) Pending hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad and Indian Bureau of Mines, Nagpur, to place on record the data of imagery from 2000 to 2013 and place on record the actual excavation of the mineral - limestone took place in the

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/WPPIL/234/2013 ORDER DATED: 25/02/2026

undefined

area of the villages Ranavav, Adityana, Boricha, Bakharla and Katvana, consisted of about 21 kms.

(I) Be pleased to pass such other and further orders as the nature and circumstances of the present case may require;"

2. We may note from the order-sheet that nothing much

has happened in the matter since the date of filing of the writ

petition apart from the amendment for inclusion of the certain

persons in the array of the parties and issuing notice to them.

3. Mr. B. M. Mangukiya, learned advocate for the

petitioner would submit that the present petition has been

become infructuous with the passage of time, inasmuch as, to

no inquiry/ investigation can be made now on the allegations

made in the writ petition.

4. In view of the above statement, the present petition is

dismissed, as having become infructuous over the period of

time. Dismissed, accordingly. Notice is discharged.

(SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ )

(D.N.RAY,J) A. B. VAGHELA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter