Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prajapati Ghevaram Vohtaram Lalaram vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 616 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 616 Guj
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Prajapati Ghevaram Vohtaram Lalaram vs State Of Gujarat on 20 February, 2026

Author: Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
                                                                                                         NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/1810/2026                              ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026

                                                                                                          undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
                                         CHARGESHEET) NO. 1810 of 2026

                       ========================================================
                                          PRAJAPATI GHEVARAM VOHTARAM LALARAM
                                                           Versus
                                                     STATE OF GUJARAT
                       ========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR. KISHAN H DAIYA(6929) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR NIRAJ SHARMA ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
                       No. 1
                       ========================================================

                            CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                                     Date : 20/02/2026

                                                      ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Kishan Daiya on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Niraj Sharma on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The present applicant who has been arraigned as accused has preferred this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11217030241359 of 2024 registered with Sidhpur Police Station, Patan for the offence punishable under Sections 17(B) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ( hereinafter referred to as the 'NDPS Act') before filing of the charge-sheet more particularly the application preferred by the applicant

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/1810/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026

undefined

having been rejected by the learned Trial Court.

4. Learned Advocate on behalf of the applicant would submit that considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled against, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that since the charge-sheet is not filed no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further submitted that applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. The present application is vehemently objected to by learned APP on behalf of respondent- State by submitting that looking to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from the FIR, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. This Court has heard learned Advocates for the respective parties and perused the FIR as well as order passed by learned Session Court as well as affidavit filed by the investigating officer before the learned Trial Court.

7. This Court has also considered the following aspects:

(i) The allegation is as regards being dealt with the contraband-

Opium weighing around 1.66 kilograms and whereas it would appear that the same was not found in the conscious possession of the present applicant.



                                (ii)    It would appear in this regard that the person, brother of the





                                                                                                              NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/1810/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026

                                                                                                              undefined




present applicant, is also arraigned as an accused insofar as the present offence is concerned and the submission being that both the present applicant and his brother were addicted to the said substance and whereas the same appears to be confirmed by the Investigating Officer in his affidavit and whereas the same also appears to have been considered by a Co-ordinate Bench while releasing the brother of the present applicant vide an order dated 19.06.2025 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 11582 of 2025.

8. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

9. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11217030241359 of 2024 registered with Sidhpur Police Station, Patan on executing a bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only ) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; [b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; [c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; [d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/1810/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026

undefined

Sessions Court concerned;

[e] Mark his presence in the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months.

[f] furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residential address without prior intimation to the I.O.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicant for being released on regular bail.

13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) NIRU

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter