Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Digubha Danabha Jadeja vs The State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 374 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 374 Guj
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Digubha Danabha Jadeja vs The State Of Gujarat on 5 February, 2026

                                                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




                              C/SCA/1287/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 05/02/2026

                                                                                                                  undefined




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                      R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1287 of 2026
                       ================================================================
                                                     DIGUBHA DANABHA JADEJA
                                                              Versus
                                                   THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
                       ================================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
                       MR NIKUNJ KANARA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
                       ================================================================
                            CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

                                                         Date : 05/02/2026
                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. Rule. Learned AGP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

2. The present Special Civil Application is filed praying for the following reliefs:

"8(a) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit and allow this petition;

(b) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction and quash and set aside illegal, arbitrary action of respondent authority showing the status of the Dumper being Registration No.GJ-12-

CT-9767, chassis No.MAT777012P3C07948 in the 'Vahan Portal' blacklisting as well as pass appropriate writ, order and direction to respondent authority remove status of blacklisting of Dumper being Registration No.GJ-12-CT-9767, chassis No.MAT777012P3C07948 in the 'Vahan Portal' in the interest of justice.

(c) Grant such other and further relief as thought fit in the interest of justice."

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the vehicle of the petitioner has been blacklisted as it is showing from the status of the vehicle from 'Vahan Portal'. He submits that the respondents have also locked/closed down the online royalty account of the petitioner without giving any hearing and without following any due process of law.






                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                              C/SCA/1287/2026                               ORDER DATED: 05/02/2026

                                                                                                           undefined




Learned counsel submits that the action of the respondents is in violation of the principle of natural justice and contrary to Rule 5(4) of the Gujarat Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017 ('the Rules 2017' for short).

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, upon instructions of Mr.Keyur Pandya, Geologist, Kachchh (East), submits that appropriate show cause notice shall be issued to the petitioner and the petitioner shall be given an effective hearing before passing a reasoned order on merits.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. In the facts of the present case and considering the provisions of Rule 5(4) of the Rules 2017, the impugned action of the respondents of blacklisting the vehicle of the petitioner and locking the ATR account of the petitioner without issuance of any show cause notice and without following any due procedure as laid down in Rule 5(4) of the Rules 2017 is bad in law. The impugned action of the respondent authorities is accordingly quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to remove the endorsement of the vehicle of the petitioner, i.e. Dumper bearing registration No.GJ-12-CT- 9767, as blacklisted on the 'Vahan Portal' and are also directed to unlock/ reopen the online royalty account of the vehicle in question forthwith.

6. It is further clarified that the respondent authorities shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law in respect of any violation by the concerned vehicle after issuance of the show cause notice, after following due process of law and after giving due hearing to the petitioner in terms of the provisions of Rule 5(4) of the Rules 2017.

7. With the aforesaid observations, the present Special Civil Application stands ALLOWED to the aforesaid extent. Rule is made

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/1287/2026 ORDER DATED: 05/02/2026

undefined

absolute. No order as to costs.

Direct Service is permitted.

Sd/-

(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.) ABHISHEK/9

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter