Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

J D Hadiyal vs State Of Gujarat
2025 Latest Caselaw 7307 Guj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7307 Guj
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2025

Gujarat High Court

J D Hadiyal vs State Of Gujarat on 8 October, 2025

                                                                                                                           NEUTRAL CITATION




                               C/SCA/9321/2010                                              ORDER DATED: 08/10/2025

                                                                                                                            undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                        R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9321 of 2010
                                                             With
                                          CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 3 of 2020
                                       In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9321 of 2010
                        ==========================================================
                                                                 J D HADIYAL
                                                                    Versus
                                                           STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR HEMAL A DAVE(3832) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
                        SWAPNESHWAR GOUTAM(9051) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
                        MR HENIL SHAH, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                        MR DG CHAUHAN(218) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                        RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
                        ==========================================================

                           CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT

                                                                  Date : 08/10/2025

                                                                   ORAL ORDER

1. This petition is filed for the following prayers:

"20(A) Quash and set aside the order dated 6.4.2010, Amended Resolution No.GKV-142009-840-k.2 dtd 14/09/2020 as well as Resolution No.GKV-162016-2240-k.2 dated 24/092020 and direct the Respondents to grant to the petitioner the pay scale of Rs.10,000-15,200 w.e.f. 22.07.2002 and further Rs.56100-177500 Pay Matrix Level-10 by following the judgment dt.25.08.2004 rendered in Special Civil Application No.9467/98 and to pay the arrears with 9% interest.

(B) During the pendency and final disposal of this petition, stay the implementation of the order dated 14/09/2020 and 24/09.2020 and the Respondent No.1 and 2 may be directed

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/9321/2010 ORDER DATED: 08/10/2025

undefined

to grant the pay scale of Rs.10,000-152,00 to the petitioner forthwith.

21(A) Quashing and setting aside the order dt.6.4.2010 and directing the Respondents to grant to the petitioner the pay scale of Rs.10,000-15,200 w.e.f.20.7.2002 by following the judgment dt.25.8.2004 rendered in Spl.C.A. No.9467/98 and to pay the arrears with 9% interest.

(B) During the pendency and final disposal of this petition, the Respondents No.2 may be directed to grant the pay scale of Rs.10,000-152,00 to the petitioner forthwith. (C) xxxx"

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he had been

promoted for the post of Executive Engineer in the pay scale

of Rs.8000-13,500 vide order dated 22.7.2002. However, the

pay scale of Rs.10,000-15,200 was not granted. Petitioner approached this Court by filing Special Civil Application

No.4608 of 2009, which was disposed of vide order dated

12.5.2009 directing to take appropriate decision. The

respondent authorities rejected the case of the petitioner vide

order dated 6.4.2010 which is challenged in the present

petition for the above prayers. Pending petition, respondent

passed further order seeking recovery vide order dated

14.9.2020 which is also challenged in the present petition.

3. The respondents have not filed their reply

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/9321/2010 ORDER DATED: 08/10/2025

undefined

controverting the averments made in the main petition.

However, respondent no.2 has filed reply in Civil Application

No.3 of 2020, to which, petitioner has contraverted by filing

rejoinder dated 14.12.2021.

4. At the outset, learned advocate for the petitioner

has submitted that the issue involved in this petition is

covered by the order of this Court dated 25.8.2004 passed in

Special Civil Application No.9467 of 1998.

5. The operative portion of the said judgment dated

25.8.2004 reads as under:

"5.1 Taking into consideration the observations of the learned Single Judge in SCA no.6131 of 1995, more particularly, at paras 5 and 6, as also, keeping in mind the observations made by the Apex Court cited above, I am of the view that the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of pay revision as prescribed by the 5th Pay Commission as claimed by him and he is required to be placed in the corresponding payscale of Rs.10,000-15,200.

6.1 In view of the foregoing discussion, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to pay all the arrears to the petitioners on account of revised pay as well as the retiral benefits together with interest at the rate of 9% from

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/9321/2010 ORDER DATED: 08/10/2025

undefined

1st January, 1996 till the payment treating the petitioners as placed in the payscale of Rs.10,000-15,200 with effect from 1st January, 1996. The payment as directed be paid to the petitioners within four months from today. Rule is made absolute accordingly."

5. Learned AGP and learned advocate for respondent

no.2 could not contravert the submission of the learned

advocate for the petitioner and learned AGP has candidly

stated that the State has already accepted the

abovementioned judgment.

6. In view of the above, when the petitioner is

similarly situated with the petitioner of Special Civil

Application No.9467 of 1998 and the issue involved in this

petition is covered by the said judgment, which had attained finality, there is nothing pointed out from the record to take

decision otherwise.

7. Therefore, this petition is allowed by quashing and

setting aside the impugned resolutions and directing the

respondents to pay all the arrears to the petitioners on

account of revised pay as well as the retiral benefits together

with interest at the rate of 9% from 2002 till the payment

treating the petitioners as placed in the payscale of

Rs.10,000-15,200, by making consequential revision, and fixing

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/SCA/9321/2010 ORDER DATED: 08/10/2025

undefined

the pension. The payment as directed be paid to the

petitioners within four months from today. Rule is made

absolute accordingly with no order as to costs.

8. In view the above order, no orders are required to

be passed on the Civil Application. Hence, disposed of

accordingly.

(SANDEEP N. BHATT,J) SRILATHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter