Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 438 Guj
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2024
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/399/2019 ORDER DATED: 17/01/2024
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 399 of 2019
================================================================
RAJESHBHAI DAMJIBHAI TILALA
Versus
KISHORKUMAR PARBATBHAI THESIYA
================================================================
Appearance:
HARSHIT M KARATHIA(7916) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR SP MAJMUDAR(3456) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
Date : 17/01/2024
ORAL ORDER
1. Present application is filed under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 107 days in
preferring the Appeal.
2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Harshit M. Karathia for
applicant and learned advocate Mr. Jamshed Kavina for learned
advocate Mr. S. P. Majmudar for respondent.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that
because of non-removal of office objections, the Special Civil
Application was dismissed on 12.09.2018. It is further submitted
that the learned advocate at that time remained under impression
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/399/2019 ORDER DATED: 17/01/2024
undefined
that time to remove office objections would be granted by the
Court, however, no time was granted and straightaway the order
came to be passed dismissing the matter on 12.09.2018.
4. On the other hand, learned advocate Mr. Kavina for the
opponent has vehemently objected in granting the application on
the ground that by virtue of this application, the proceedings i.e.
Special Execution No.4/2011 pending before Taluka Court,
Dhoraji are stalled and the opponent is not enjoying the fruits of
the judgment and decree which has been passed in favour of the
present opponent. It is further submitted that the delay has not
sufficiently been explained and hence, the present application
may be rejected. It is further submitted that the aforesaid
execution proceedings are stalled only because of the pendency
of the present application, if delay is condoned, the execution
proceedings may be directed to be proceeded further.
5. Against this, learned advocate for the applicant, upon
instructions, states that delay may be condoned and the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/399/2019 ORDER DATED: 17/01/2024
undefined
proceedings i.e. Special Execution No.4/2011 pending before
Taluka Court, Dhoraji be proceeded in accordance with law.
6. Considering the submissions of learned advocates for the
respective parties and the averments made in the application, the
lenient view is required to be adopted and accordingly, the delay
is condoned.
7. Learned advocate for the applicant has further submitted
that he shall remove the office objections before 24th January
2024 and upon removal of office objections, the restoration
application may be listed on board for hearing. Restoration
application is directed to be restored to its original File for
hearing after removing the office objections, on or before
24.01.2024. This Civil Application is allowed. However, it is
made clear that there shall be no stay against the proceedings of
Special Execution No.4/2011, which is pending before Taluka
Court, Dhoraji.
(D. M. DESAI,J) RINKU MALI
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!