Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 112 Guj
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2024
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2229/2023 ORDER DATED: 04/01/2024
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 2229 of
2023
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 16255 of 2018
==========================================================
BHAGVAT N. DALVADI SINCE DECD THROUGH LHR
Versus
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER VADODARA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS.KHUSHBOO V MALKAN(5932) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4
for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MS. FORAM U TRIVEDI AGP, ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO
GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
Date : 04/01/2024
ORAL ORDER
1. This application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
for condonation of delay of 660 days in preferring the First Appeal.
2. Rule. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Foram U.
Trivedi appears on advance copy waives the service of notice of
Rule for respondent-State.
3. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned AGP for
the respondent-State.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2229/2023 ORDER DATED: 04/01/2024
undefined
4. Learned advocate for the applicants submitted that Bhagvat N.
Dalvadi (since deceased) was a patient of Lung Cancer, therefore, he
was unable to attend Court as he was bedridden for most of the time,
which could enable him to file appeal. He has placed reliance on
decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of K. Subbarayadu
and others Vs. The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition)
reported in 2017(12) SCC 840 and would submit that considering
the law laid down in aforementioned case, the applicants are not
claiming their right for the interest upon the enhanced compensation,
if any, for the delay period. It is further submitted that the delay is
not intentional and there was no lethargy on the part of the
applicants.
5. Per contra, there is an objection on the part of the learned AGP
that the delay has not been sufficiently explained and therefore,
present application may be dismissed.
6. Applying the ratio of aforestated judgment in background of
the facts of the present case as well as considering the law laid down
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of K. Subbarayadu (Supra), the
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/2229/2023 ORDER DATED: 04/01/2024
undefined
application seeking condonation of delay deserves consideration.
However, the claimant would not be entitled to claim interest on the
enhanced amount of compensation, if any, during the delay period.
7. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the delay
has sufficiently been explained. Therefore, this application is
allowed subject to the condition that the applicant-claimant shall not
be entitled to claim interest on the period of delay caused in
preferring the First Appeal on enhanced amount of award, if any.
Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
(D. M. DESAI,J) Vikramsinh Amarsinh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!