Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 959 Guj
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2024
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/1806/2024 ORDER DATED: 05/02/2024
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1806 of 2024
==========================================================
SUDHIRBHAI NAGINDAS DOSHI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. DHAVAL G BAROT(6546) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
SANKET K PANDYA(9451) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
=========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP N. BHATT
Date : 05/02/2024
ORAL ORDER
1. The challenge in this petition is the order dated
14.7.2023 passed by the learned Aux.Chamber Judge of City
Civil Court at Ahmedabad below Exh.1 in disposing the Civil
Miscellaneous Application No.16 of 2023 ordering it to convert int a civil suit.
2. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner.
3. Learned advocate for the petitioner has drawn my
attention to the impugned order and submitted that in view
of the objection raised in the Probate Application, the Probate
Application is now converted into Civil Suit and it has
become contentious. He submitted that the learned trial court
has committed error in doing so, as the objector is interested
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/1806/2024 ORDER DATED: 05/02/2024
undefined
in delaying the proceedings.
4. Considering the fact that now it is settled position
of law, more particularly, under the provisions of the Indian
Succession Act that wherever any application for Probate or
Letter of Administration is filed and court receives objection
in any manner, then the court has to decide such application
as if the court is deciding the suit proceedings, the impugned
order passed by the learned trial court is just and proper.
Therefore, there is no illegality or perversity or jurisdictional
error in passing such order.
5. In view of the above and considering the judgment
in the case of Garment Craft V/s Prakash Chand Goel reported in (2022) 4 SCC 181, more particularly, paragraph
nos.15 to 17 therein, where it was held that High Courts
while exercising powers under Article 227 does not act as
appellate authority and cannot reappreciate evidence and the
jurisdiction exercised under Article 227 is in nature of
correctional jurisdiction to set aside grave dereliction of duty
or flagrant abuse of process of law and High Court cannot
substitute its own view on merits, this petition is dismissed
at this stage without expressing any opinion on merits of the
proceedings.
(SANDEEP N. BHATT,J) SRILATHA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!