Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maheshbhai S/O Manilal Bechardash ... vs State Of Gujarat
2024 Latest Caselaw 1589 Guj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1589 Guj
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2024

Gujarat High Court

Maheshbhai S/O Manilal Bechardash ... vs State Of Gujarat on 21 February, 2024

                                                                                NEUTRAL CITATION




     R/CR.A/2739/2023                            ORDER DATED: 21/02/2024

                                                                                undefined




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (REGULAR BAIL) NO. 2739 of 2023

==========================================================
             MAHESHBHAI S/O MANILAL BECHARDASH PATEL
                              Versus
                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AVANIDHAR M THAKORE(10377) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR HK PATEL, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
ROHANKUMAR M AMIN(8851) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

                             Date : 21/02/2024

                              ORAL ORDER

1. By way of the present appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, the 'Act, 1989'), the appellant - original accused has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No.Part-A-11191035231212 of 2023 registered with Naroda Police Station, Ahmedabad.

2. Learned advocate for the appellant submits that no case of rape is made out on reading FIR. It is submitted that even no case under Atrocities Act is made out. It is submitted that on going by FIR, it is consensual relationship at the most between the parties. It is submitted there is allegation that the petitioner has siphoned away Rs.4 lakhs which are obtained by pledging gold ornaments belonging to first informant. It is submitted that the appellant is behind bar since 18.09.2023, investigation is complete and charge-sheet is filed. Therefore, it is submitted to

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.A/2739/2023 ORDER DATED: 21/02/2024

undefined

grant regular to the appellant.

3. Learned advocate for the first informant submitted that victim was lured under the pretext of getting marriage and physical relationship was taken place between the parties. It is submitted that on false promise of marriage, the appellant has misused position of first informant. Apart from it, gold ornaments of Rs.4 lakhs has been pledge by the petitioner before the goldsmith and obtained loan and siphoned the amount and therefore, no case is made out to grant bail to the appellant.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

4. Heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties and perused the papers. At the outset, on going through the facts of the FIR, what appears that first informant - victim is widow lady. She has two children, one aged 20 years and other aged 12 years. On reading FIR, nowhere it is coming that relationship between the parties have started under promise of marriage. The first informant is 47 years old. She must be knowing pros and cons of relationship. What further appears that there is consensual relationship and once relationship became sour, FIR is filed. So far as siphoning of amount of Rs.4 lakhs is concerned, statement of Mr.Ketankumar Shah, goldsmith is recorded on 04.08.2023. It indicates that appellant and victim both went together to obtain loan to get back gold ornaments which were pledged with Muthodh Finance and goldsmith has

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.A/2739/2023 ORDER DATED: 21/02/2024

undefined

paid Rs.3.10 lakhs to Muthodh Finance. Thereafter, victim and appellant went to Muthodh Finance and brought back gold ornaments and pledged the gold ornaments with goldsmith. Thereafter, goldsmith has given Rs.50,000/- more. According to the statement of Ketankumar Shah, amount has been handed over to the victim. In these circumstances, no case is made out that appellant has siphoned amount of Rs.4 lakhs. This Court has granted regular bail to the co-accused in Criminal Misc. Application No.2626 of 2023 after referring to the judgment of Jagjeet Singh v/s. Ashish Mishra (2022) 9 SCC 321, whereby, the Hon'ble Apex Court has reiterated and approved the facts to be considered for grant of bail in Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v/s. Ashis Chatterjee (2010) 14 SCC 496.

5. Taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, role attributed to the accused, without discussing the evidence in detail, at this stage, I am inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the appellant.

6. In the result, the present appeal is allowed. The appellant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with FIR registered as C.R.No.Part-A-11191035231212 of 2023 registered with Naroda Police Station, Ahmedabad on executing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court and subject to the conditions that the appellant shall:-

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.A/2739/2023 ORDER DATED: 21/02/2024

undefined

[c] not leave the territory of India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

[d] appear before the Investigation Officer concerned, as and when required for investigation purpose and attend Court concerned regularly.

[e] furnish the present address of residence along with the proof to the I.O. concerned and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Sessions Court concerned;

7. The competent authority will release the appellant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open to the concerned Court to delete, modify or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the appellant on bail.

8. The appeal succeeds. Direct service is permitted.

(J. C. DOSHI,J) SATISH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter