Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1108 Guj
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2024
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/627/2024 ORDER DATED: 08/02/2024
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 627 of
2024
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 34334 of 2023
==========================================================
REMATBEN ABABHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KRUSHNAKANT D PATEL(10632) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
MR TEJAS P SATTA(3149) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR ADITYA D DAVDA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
Date : 08/02/2024
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Aditya D
Davda appears on advance copy waives the service of notice of Rule
for respondent-State.
2. This application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act,
1963 for condonation of delay of 1414 days in preferring the First
Appeal.
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/627/2024 ORDER DATED: 08/02/2024
undefined
3. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned AGP for
the respondent-State.
4. Learned advocate for the applicants submitted that applicants
are not much literate and are poor small agriculturists. It is submitted
that applicants are not aware about the procedure of the court of law.
He has placed reliance on decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
case of K. Subbarayadu and others Vs. The Special Deputy
Collector (Land Acquisition) reported in 2017(12) SCC 840 and
would submit that considering the law laid down in aforementioned
case, the applicants are not claiming their right for the interest upon
the enhanced compensation, if any, for the delay period. It is further
submitted that the delay is not intentional and there was no lethargy
on the part of the applicants.
5. Per contra, there is an objection on the part of the learned AGP
that the delay has not been sufficiently explained and therefore,
present application may be dismissed.
6. Applying the ratio of aforestated judgment in background of
the facts of the present case as well as considering the law laid down
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/627/2024 ORDER DATED: 08/02/2024
undefined
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of K. Subbarayadu (Supra), the
application seeking condonation of delay deserves consideration.
However, the claimant would not be entitled to claim interest on the
enhanced amount of compensation, if any, during the delay period.
7. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the delay
has sufficiently been explained. Therefore, this application is
allowed subject to the condition that the applicant-claimant shall not
be entitled to claim interest on the period of delay caused in
preferring the First Appeal on enhanced amount of award, if any.
Rule is made absolute.
(D. M. DESAI,J) Vikramsinh Amarsinh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!