Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Phillips Carbon Black Limited (Now ... vs Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 1061 Guj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1061 Guj
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2024

Gujarat High Court

Phillips Carbon Black Limited (Now ... vs Union Of India on 7 February, 2024

Author: Bhargav D. Karia

Bench: Bhargav D. Karia

                                                                                          NEUTRAL CITATION




     C/TAXAP/605/2023                                      ORDER DATED: 07/02/2024

                                                                                           undefined




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                          R/TAX APPEAL NO. 605 of 2023

==========================================================
 PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LIMITED (NOW KNOWN AS PCBL LIMITED)
                           Versus
                      UNION OF INDIA
==========================================================
Appearance:
ANANDODAYA S MISHRA(8038) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
for the Opponent(s) No. 1
MS HETVI H SANCHETI(5618) for the Opponent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
       and
       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRAL R. MEHTA

                                Date : 07/02/2024

                         ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)

1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Anandodaya Mishra for the

appellant and learned advocate Ms.Hetvi H. Sancheti for the

respondent No.2.

2. By this Appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise

Act, 1944, the appellant has proposed the following

substantial questions of law, arising out of the impugned

order dated 29.4.2022 passed by the Customs, Excise and

Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at

Ahmedabad (for short 'the Tribunal') in Excise Appeal

No.10243 of 2019 :

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/TAXAP/605/2023 ORDER DATED: 07/02/2024

undefined

"(A) Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal was correct in remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) when the law categorically includes clearance of final goods from the place of removal till under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 before its amendment on 1.4.2008?

(B) Whether the remand by Hon'ble Tribunal results in Board Circular overriding the settled provisions of law and traversing beyond the show cause notice?

(C) Whether the period for which the appellant has availed the CENVAT Credit is a period prior to the amendment in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and Hon'ble Tribunal was justified in not discussing on facts, as Hon'ble Tribunal being the last fact-finding body?

(D) Whether Hon'ble Tribunal order suffers arbitrariness by not dealing or giving any finding on jurisdiction, delayed adjudication and limitation?

3. The Tribunal in the impugned order has held as under :

"4. I have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the records. I find that prior to 1.4.2008, the services related to removal of the goods was 'from the place of removal' which was replaced as

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/TAXAP/605/2023 ORDER DATED: 07/02/2024

undefined

amended with effect from 1.4.2008 as 'up to the place of removal'. Therefore, the Cenvat Credit prima facie is available in case of outward transportation for the services availed from the place of removal up to the customers place. However, I also agree with learned Authorized Representative that Board has prescribed certain conditions for allowing credit which need to be satisfied. Since the adjudicating authority has not verified the fact that, whether the said conditions of Board Circular have been complied with or not, the matter needs to be reconsidered.

5. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside and Appeal deserves to be remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for passing a fresh order after verifying the documents to ascertain that whether the appellant has fulfilled the condition as prescribed in the Board's Circular No.97/8/2007-St dated 23.8.2007. Needless to say that the Adjudicating Authority shall consider the judgments cited by both the sides. The appeal is allowed by way of remand to the Adjudicating Authority."

4. In view of the aforesaid finding, learned advocate

Mr.Anandodaya Mishra for the appellant, under the

instructions, does not press this Appeal so as to enable the

appellant to appear before the Adjudicating Authority, raising

all the contentions which were raised before this Court.

NEUTRAL CITATION

C/TAXAP/605/2023 ORDER DATED: 07/02/2024

undefined

5. Without entering into merits of the matter, the Appeal is

accordingly disposed of as not pressed, at this stage.

(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)

(NIRAL R. MEHTA,J) V.J. SATWARA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter