Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2441 Guj
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2023
R/CR.MA/5076/2023 ORDER DATED: 21/03/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 5076 of 2023
In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 663 of 2023
With
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 663 of 2023
==========================================================
VAKTABHAI KODARBHAI PATEL
Versus
PATEL AMRUTBHAI PRABHUBHAI
==========================================================
Appearance:
KUMAR H TRIVEDI(9364) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
MR. BHARGAV PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 21/03/2023
ORAL ORDER
ORDER IN R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 5076 of 2023
1. Heard Mr. Kumar H. Trivedi, learned advocate on record for the
applicant-original complainant.
2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice
of rule for and on behalf of respondent-State.
3. This is an application seeking leave to appeal filed under Section
378(4) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking permission of this
Court to challenge the judgment and order of acquittal dated
14.02.2023 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vadali in
R/CR.MA/5076/2023 ORDER DATED: 21/03/2023
Criminal Case No.1389 of 2021. By the said judgment and order,
learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vadali, has recorded the order
of acquittal of respondent Nos.1 and 2 for the offence punishable
under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.
4. Learned advocate Mr. Kumar H. Trivedi appearing for the
applicant has invited attention of this Court to the list of the
documents, brought on record, which includes village form No.8(A) as
well as village form No.7(12). He has submitted that in all four
different parcels of agricultural lands were jointly owned by the
complainant and his two sons. By relying upon the aforesaid
document, he has submitted that trial court failed to appreciate the
aforesaid evidence brought on record by the complainant and on
irrelevant consideration, has accepted the defence raised by the
accused. He has further submitted that the accused has borrowed the
goods for his wholesale business and against the same, he had issued
cheques in the name of his firm. He therefore, submitted that in
absence of any denial of his signature on the disputed cheque, the
presumption under Section 139 of N.I. Act with regard to existence of
legally enforceable debt existed in favour of the complainant. He
therefore, urged this Court to grant present leave to appeal.
5. Considering the submissions made by learned advocate
R/CR.MA/5076/2023 ORDER DATED: 21/03/2023
appearing for the applicant and having perused the grounds raised in
the memo of appeal, prima facie, present application for leave to
appeal requires consideration. Hence, present application seeking
leave to appeal is allowed. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid
extent.
ORDER IN R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 663 of 2023
1. ADMIT.
2. Learned APP waives service of notice of admission for and on
behalf of respondent-State.
3. Issue bailable warrant of Rs. 10,000/- against private
respondent/s.
4. Private respondent/s be served through concerned police
station.
5. Registry is hereby directed to call for Record & Proceedings
before the next date of hearing.
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) SUYASH SRIVASTAVA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!